New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft SC-300 Exam - Topic 5 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-300 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 5
[All SC-300 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains a Microsoft SharePoint Online site named Site1.

You need to ensure that users can request access to Site. the solution must meet the following requirements.

* Automatically approve requests from users based on their group membership.

* Automatically remove the access after 30 days

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Princess
4 months ago
Wait, can you really automate removal after 30 days? That’s cool!
upvoted 0 times
...
My
4 months ago
I heard option C is more for managing roles, not access requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
4 months ago
Not so sure about that. What if users need longer access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that! Makes sense for group-based access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
5 months ago
I think option B is the way to go for access packages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
I feel like Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is more focused on monitoring and security, so it probably isn't the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage access based on roles, but I don't think Azure AD Privileged Identity Management fits this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Conditional Access policies being more about security rather than access requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
5 months ago
I think creating an access package might be the right choice since it can handle group memberships and time-limited access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem a bit similar, but I'm leaning towards B - to communicate the technical readiness of the project. That seems like a key purpose of an Architecture Compliance review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between NVL, NVL2, and COALESCE. I'll need to review my notes on these functions to make sure I understand them properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's not entirely clear to me what the difference is between the various options, like "save a copy" vs. "take a snapshot". I'll need to read through the choices carefully to make sure I understand the nuances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
5 months ago
It sounds familiar that Cisco Express Forwarding needs to be enabled, but I can't recall if it's a must for BFD to work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel