New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft SC-200 Exam - Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-200 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All SC-200 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 subscription that uses Azure Defender. You have 100 virtual machines in a resource group named RG1.

You assign the Security Admin roles to a new user named SecAdmin1.

You need to ensure that SecAdmin1 can apply quick fixes to the virtual machines by using Azure Defender. The solution must use the principle of least privilege.

Which role should you assign to SecAdmin1?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Aracelis at Jul 06, 2025, 05:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SC-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Casandra
2 months ago
I disagree, Contributor for the subscription seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
3 months ago
Security Reader won't let them apply quick fixes, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
3 months ago
Definitely not the Owner role, that's too much access!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
3 months ago
I’m surprised there’s no specific role for quick fixes in Azure Defender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
3 months ago
I think SecAdmin1 needs the Contributor role for RG1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
4 months ago
The Contributor for the subscription seems excessive. I believe we should focus on the specific resource group instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the Owner role might give too much access. We need to stick to least privilege.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where least privilege was key. I feel like the Contributor role for RG1 could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
I think the Security Reader role might be too limited since it doesn't allow for applying quick fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which role would be the best fit, as I need to balance the security requirements with the principle of least privilege. I'll need to review the details of each role option carefully before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since SecAdmin1 needs to apply quick fixes to the VMs, they'll need some level of access to those resources. The Contributor role for the resource group RG1 should give them the necessary permissions while still limiting their access to just that group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Azure Defender is used for security, but I'm not sure which role would allow SecAdmin1 to apply quick fixes to the VMs while still following the principle of least privilege.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Azure Defender and role assignments. I'll need to carefully consider the principle of least privilege to determine the appropriate role for SecAdmin1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
7 months ago
Wait, we can use Azure Defender to apply quick fixes? That's pretty cool. I wonder if it also comes with a built-in coffee maker to keep us awake during those long security checks.
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
5 months ago
C) the Contributor role for RG1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
7 months ago
A) the Security Reader role for the subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamey
7 months ago
I'm just glad I don't have to manage all those virtual machines. Imagine the headache of keeping them all secure! This question is making me tired just thinking about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
7 months ago
I agree with Desiree. The Contributor role for RG1 seems like the best option here. It's specific to the resource group, so SecAdmin1 won't have unnecessary access elsewhere.
upvoted 0 times
Alita
6 months ago
I agree, the Contributor role for RG1 follows the principle of least privilege and gives SecAdmin1 the necessary permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
7 months ago
I think the Contributor role for RG1 is the right choice. It limits access to just the virtual machines in that resource group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daisy
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't the Security Reader role for the subscription be more appropriate to maintain the principle of least privilege?
upvoted 0 times
Lewis
6 months ago
I don't think that's necessary. Security Reader role should be enough for quick fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
6 months ago
B) the Contributor for the subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
7 months ago
I think that makes sense. It limits the access to just what SecAdmin1 needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
7 months ago
A) the Security Reader role for the subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
8 months ago
I agree with Lyla, the Security Reader role for the subscription follows the principle of least privilege.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
8 months ago
I think the answer is C. The Contributor role for RG1 would give SecAdmin1 the necessary permissions to apply quick fixes to the virtual machines without granting more privileges than required.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
7 months ago
C) the Contributor role for RG1
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
7 months ago
B) the Contributor for the subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
8 months ago
A) the Security Reader role for the subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lillian
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe the Contributor role for RG1 would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
8 months ago
I think the role should be the Security Reader role for the subscription.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel