Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-500 Exam - Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-500 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All PL-500 Questions]

You are developing a power Automate desktop flow to process documentation. The flow has a variable bank account numbers.

Users are able to view bank account number while the flow is tested.

You need to ensure the bank account number are not visible in the flow.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lili at Mar 07, 2024, 01:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hildegarde
4 months ago
Changing the external name? Not sure that really helps with security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
Disabling variables won't protect the data, so that's a no.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
4 months ago
Wait, can you really just hide it like that? Seems too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
4 months ago
Totally agree, option B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
I think marking the variable as sensitive is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
5 months ago
I feel like turning on Secure input is more relevant for cloud flows, but I’m not sure if it applies here since this is a desktop flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between marking it as disabled and marking it as sensitive. Do both options really prevent visibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to secure sensitive information, and marking it as sensitive seemed to be the best option then too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
5 months ago
I think marking the variable as sensitive might be the right choice, but I'm not entirely sure if that's enough to hide it during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
5 months ago
Ah, I see. The key is to make sure the variable is marked as sensitive. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a sensitive issue. I better make sure I don't accidentally expose any sensitive information in my flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. I just need to make sure I understand the question correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about how to keep those bank account numbers secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
6 months ago
Developing privacy policies seems more like a "Design" or "Implement" phase task, not "Discover." I'm confident C is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
6 months ago
Alright, let's think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the command to enable application hosting, so we need to look for something related to that functionality. I'm leaning towards option B, "iox-service", as it seems the most logical choice based on the wording of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
6 months ago
Ah, I've seen questions like this before. The key is to identify the process that involves the entity's own personnel and is designed to achieve objectives. That sounds like the definition of internal control, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 years ago
I believe changing the external name could also help in keeping the bank account numbers hidden.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 years ago
But would turning on Secure input in a cloud flow also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 years ago
I agree, marking it as sensitive will ensure the bank account numbers are not visible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 years ago
I think we should mark the variable as sensitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well. Marking the variable as sensitive is the most straightforward way to keep those bank account numbers under lock and key. Plus, it's probably the easiest option to implement without any unexpected side effects.
upvoted 0 times
Noah
2 years ago
Good choice. That should protect the bank account numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
2 years ago
Let's go with marking it as sensitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
2 years ago
Definitely the safest way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 years ago
I agree, it's the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 years ago
That sounds like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
2 years ago
B) Mark the variable as sensitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Temeka
2 years ago
Ooh, I was considering option D - changing the external name. That could work too, right? Might be a bit of a hassle, but it could do the trick. Although, now that I think about it, marking it as sensitive is probably the more elegant solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 years ago
I agree, B is the way to go. Marking the variable as sensitive is the best solution to ensure the bank account numbers remain confidential. We don't want any unauthorized access to that sensitive information, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. We need to make sure the bank account numbers are not visible during the testing of the Power Automate desktop flow. I'm thinking option B - marking the variable as sensitive seems like the way to go. That should keep the numbers hidden from prying eyes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel