Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-500 Exam - Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

You need to create the custom connector that will be used to retrieve member information.Which authentication option should you use?
A) API key
B) No authentication
C) OAuth2.0
D) Basic
E) Windows

Microsoft PL-500 Exam - Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-500 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All PL-500 Questions]

You need to create the custom connector that will be used to retrieve member information.

Which authentication option should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Helaine at Mar 31, 2023, 10:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kanisha
7 months ago
Wait, can we really use Windows for this? Sounds odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
7 months ago
I disagree, Basic auth is outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
7 months ago
No authentication? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
8 months ago
API key is simpler but less secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
8 months ago
I think OAuth2.0 is the best choice for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
8 months ago
I feel like No authentication could be risky, but I’ve seen questions where it was acceptable for public data. Not sure if this applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether to choose Basic authentication or OAuth2.0. I think I need to review the differences again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question where API keys were used, but I feel like OAuth2.0 might be more appropriate for member data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
8 months ago
I think OAuth2.0 is the most secure option for retrieving member information, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s necessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
8 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think option B, "Execute the Soft Delete action to ignore the provide substrate," is the way to go. That seems like the most straightforward solution to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I'm not totally confident, but I'm going to go with D. It sounds like the Discovery schedule is directly populating the assets table, which seems like the most comprehensive option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key is to identify the two correct modes of operation from the options provided. I'll need to review my notes on SFP+ technology to make the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 year ago
E) Windows? I think you might be a bit lost here, my friend. This is a custom connector, not a Windows domain.
upvoted 0 times
Jettie
1 year ago
D) Basic authentication can also be used for this custom connector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latonia
1 year ago
A) API key is another good option for authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 is the authentication option you should use.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlean
1 year ago
A) API key? Hmm, I don't know, feels a bit like putting all my eggs in one basket.
upvoted 0 times
Larae
12 months ago
A) API key could work if you keep it secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
1 year ago
D) Basic authentication might be too simple for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 sounds like a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deangelo
1 year ago
D) Basic authentication? Really? That's so last decade. Security is key these days.
upvoted 0 times
Elly
11 months ago
C) OAuth2.0 is definitely the best choice for ensuring member information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
12 months ago
E) Windows authentication could work, but it's not as widely used for custom connectors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
12 months ago
A) API key might be easier to set up, but it's not as secure as OAuth2.0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
12 months ago
C) OAuth2.0 is the way to go for secure authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 is definitely the best choice for ensuring the security of member information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
E) Windows authentication could work, but OAuth2.0 is more widely used and trusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
1 year ago
A) API key might be easier to set up, but it's not as secure as OAuth2.0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 is the way to go for secure authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think API key could also be a good option for authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 year ago
I agree with Almeta, OAuth2.0 provides secure authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 is the way to go! Secure and industry-standard authentication, can't go wrong with that.
upvoted 0 times
Noah
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 year ago
D) Basic
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
A) API key
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
1 year ago
C) OAuth2.0 is the way to go! Secure and industry-standard authentication, can't go wrong with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
1 year ago
I think we should use OAuth2.0 for authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel