New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 4 Question 126 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 126
Topic #: 4
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than once correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are designing a one-way integration from the Common Data Service to another system.

You must use an Azure Function to update the other system. The integration must send only newly created records to the other system. The solution must support scenarios where a component of the integration is unavailable for more than a few seconds to avoid data loss.

You need to design the integration solution.

Solution: Register a service endpoint in the Common Data Service that connects to an Azure Service Bus queue.

Register a step at the endpoint which runs asynchronously on the record's Create message and in the portoperation stage.

Configure the Azure Function to process records as they are added to the queue.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Microsoft Dataverse supports integration with Azure.

For the Dataverse and Azure connection to work, there must be at least one solution in an Azure Service Bus solution account, where the solution contains one or more service endpoints.

For a queue endpoint contract, a listener doesn't have to be actively listening.


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/developer/common-data-service/azure-integration

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shawnee
3 days ago
Using a Service Bus is a smart move for reliability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
8 days ago
I think it might be overkill for just new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
14 days ago
Wait, can the Azure Function handle spikes in traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
19 days ago
Hmm, I wonder if the Azure Function can handle the load if there's a sudden spike in new records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
24 days ago
Funny, I always thought the Common Data Service was just for storing common data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
29 days ago
Asynchronous processing is a good approach for this integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
1 month ago
The Azure Service Bus queue should help with the data loss issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 month ago
I wonder if the solution really handles the scenario of component unavailability effectively. I feel like there might be a better way to ensure no data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 month ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to use Azure Functions with Service Bus. I feel like this is similar, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure if registering the step at the endpoint is the right approach. I remember something about needing to ensure message durability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
2 months ago
I think this solution might work because using a Service Bus queue can help with handling the records asynchronously.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Using the Service Bus queue to decouple the integration and the Azure Function to process the records seems like a solid approach. As long as we configure the queue and function properly, I think this solution should meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
2 months ago
Yes, this solution seems to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
2 months ago
Definitely meets the goal, I agree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
3 months ago
The solution they provided sounds like it could work, but I'm a little concerned about the potential for data loss if the queue becomes unavailable for an extended period. I'd want to explore some additional safeguards or backup mechanisms to ensure we don't lose any data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
3 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the part where it says the solution must support scenarios where a component is unavailable for more than a few seconds. I'm not sure if using a queue would fully address that requirement. Maybe there's another approach I'm missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
3 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward integration problem. I think the solution they provided could work, but I'd want to double-check a few things to make sure it fully meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Carline
3 months ago
I agree, it looks straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel