Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 1 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 116
Topic #: 1
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note; This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Publish the custom connector to AppSource.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Joanna at Mar 07, 2025, 06:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Helene
2 months ago
AppSource? Really? That's like trying to rent out your neighbor's car to the entire neighborhood. I think we're missing the mark here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
2 months ago
AppSource? Isn't that like trying to sell a custom wrench to the whole world when you only need it in your own garage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
Oh, I see. So the correct answer is No then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
Haha, AppSource? What is this, a global takeover? I think a private deployment would be more appropriate for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, AppSource seems too public for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, a private deployment would be better for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
2 months ago
User 1: AppSource is not the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
2 months ago
I agree with Jina, we shouldn't publish it to AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
But if we publish it to AppSource, won't it be visible to everyone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
3 months ago
AppSource? Are you serious? That's like using a cannon to kill a fly. Let's keep it simple and internal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
Wow, publishing to AppSource? That's overkill for a single-tenant app. Shouldn't we just deploy it within the tenant?
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
2 months ago
User 4: Publishing to AppSource is not the right solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
2 months ago
User 3: Definitely, deploying within the tenant would meet the goal without unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, we should just deploy it within the tenant to keep it simple and accessible only to users in the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, deploying to AppSource seems like too much for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
3 months ago
I disagree, I think the solution is No.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I think the solution is Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel