New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-400 Exam - Topic 1 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 116
Topic #: 1
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note; This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Publish the custom connector to AppSource.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Joanna at Mar 07, 2025, 06:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stevie
3 months ago
I thought AppSource was for sharing with everyone, not just one tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
Nope, definitely not the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
3 months ago
Wait, is it really that straightforward?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
4 months ago
Totally agree, that won't work for single tenant!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
4 months ago
Publishing to AppSource makes it public, not tenant-specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I might be overthinking it, but I think the solution could be correct if there’s a way to limit visibility after publishing, but I doubt it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
4 months ago
I feel like we discussed this in class, and the consensus was that AppSource is for broader distribution, so it probably doesn't meet the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to restrict access to a custom connector, and I think it involved deploying it directly within the tenant instead of AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
I'm not sure if publishing to AppSource is the right move since it seems like that would make it accessible to everyone, not just our tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
5 months ago
Ah, I see the issue now. Deploying to AppSource would make the connector publicly available, which doesn't align with the requirement of it being visible and accessible only to the tenant users. I'll need to come up with a more targeted deployment strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
5 months ago
I think the key here is to find a way to deploy the custom connector that keeps it visible and accessible only to the tenant users. AppSource doesn't seem to meet that criteria, so I'll need to consider other deployment methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions a unique solution for each question, so I'll need to explore other options beyond just publishing to AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Deploying to AppSource doesn't sound like it would make the connector visible and accessible only to users in the tenant, as required. I'll have to think of a different solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
AppSource? Really? That's like trying to rent out your neighbor's car to the entire neighborhood. I think we're missing the mark here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
11 months ago
AppSource? Isn't that like trying to sell a custom wrench to the whole world when you only need it in your own garage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
11 months ago
Oh, I see. So the correct answer is No then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
Haha, AppSource? What is this, a global takeover? I think a private deployment would be more appropriate for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
10 months ago
User 3: Yeah, AppSource seems too public for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, a private deployment would be better for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
11 months ago
User 1: AppSource is not the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
11 months ago
I agree with Jina, we shouldn't publish it to AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
12 months ago
But if we publish it to AppSource, won't it be visible to everyone?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
12 months ago
AppSource? Are you serious? That's like using a cannon to kill a fly. Let's keep it simple and internal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
12 months ago
Wow, publishing to AppSource? That's overkill for a single-tenant app. Shouldn't we just deploy it within the tenant?
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
11 months ago
User 4: Publishing to AppSource is not the right solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
11 months ago
User 3: Definitely, deploying within the tenant would meet the goal without unnecessary steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, we should just deploy it within the tenant to keep it simple and accessible only to users in the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, deploying to AppSource seems like too much for a single-tenant app.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
12 months ago
I disagree, I think the solution is No.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
12 months ago
I think the solution is Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel