Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft PL-300 Exam - Topic 15 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-300 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 15
[All PL-300 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are modeling data by using Microsoft Power BI. Part of the data model is a large Microsoft SQL Server table named Order that has more than 100 million records.

During the development process, you need to import a sample of the data from the Order table.

Solution: From Power Query Editor, you import the table and then add a filter step to the query.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Alverta
4 months ago
Agreed, using filters is a smart move for managing big data!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
Wait, can you really handle 100 million records like that? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
4 months ago
Definitely meets the goal! Filtering is key for large datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
4 months ago
I think it doesn't really meet the goal. You need to limit the rows first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
Yes, filtering in Power Query is a solid way to sample data!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards "No" because I recall that filtering after import can still lead to performance issues with such a large table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
I feel like importing the entire table first might not be the best approach. I think we should be able to sample directly without bringing in all those records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where filtering was key, but I wonder if just filtering after importing is enough for a large dataset like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
I think adding a filter step in Power Query should help reduce the amount of data imported, but I'm not entirely sure if it meets the goal of sampling effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about how to generate a GUID in code, so I think the answer is probably a call to a JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between single and double quotes when using environment variables. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
6 months ago
I vaguely remember something about the percentage of the business value being key to the deferral, but I'm not sure if it's specifically over 50%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
6 months ago
I seem to recall that composability is about how services work together, so I guess I'm also leaning towards False.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
10 months ago
This is a no-brainer. Filtering the data in Power Query is the perfect solution. It's like a ninja move to handle that huge table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
10 months ago
Absolutely, the filter step is the way to go. It's like using a magic wand to summon only the data you need - no more, no less.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
10 months ago
Haha, 100 million records? That's a lot of data! This solution definitely beats trying to import the whole thing. Well done, Power BI!
upvoted 0 times
Lorrie
9 months ago
User 4: Power BI for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
9 months ago
User 3: Agreed, this solution is much more efficient
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
User 2: Definitely, importing the whole table would have been a nightmare
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
9 months ago
User 1: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Page
10 months ago
I agree, using a filter step is a smart approach. It allows you to quickly get a sample of the data without having to load the full 100 million records.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
9 months ago
User 3: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
9 months ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
10 months ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
11 months ago
Yes, this solution looks good to me. Filtering the data in the Power Query Editor is a great way to work with a large dataset without bringing in the entire table.
upvoted 0 times
Verona
9 months ago
Yes, this solution looks good to me. Filtering the data in the Power Query Editor is a great way to work with a large dataset without bringing in the entire table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
10 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Art
11 months ago
A) Yes, but adding a filter step can help reduce the amount of data being imported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
11 months ago
B) No, I think importing the entire table would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
11 months ago
A) Yes, that sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
11 months ago
A) Yes, because filtering the data before importing will reduce the amount of data being loaded into Power BI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
12 months ago
B) No, because importing the entire table first before filtering would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
12 months ago
A) Yes, because adding a filter step will help in importing a sample of the data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel