I practiced a similar question where adding calculated columns in Power Query was emphasized, but I can't recall if it was specifically about the calendar quarter and month.
I'm not entirely sure, but I think using the Auto date/time option in option B could simplify things, though it might not be as flexible as a custom date table.
I'm a little confused by this question. The incident response team seems to have done a lot of the right things, so I'm not sure what the missing step could be. I'll need to re-read the NIST guidelines carefully to figure this out.
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points. The prompt is asking for an exception to the general rule that audit standards should be followed. I'll need to carefully consider each option and determine which one does not fit that criteria.
Okay, I've got this. The key is to focus on the fact that the information is coming from a database owned by another department. That means the stakeholder who can approve access is likely someone in a governance or oversight role for that department's systems. I'll go with option D, Governance Approach.
C is the correct answer.
D is wrong for two reasons:
1) it says to use DAX in Power Query. In Power Query you use M
2) it suggests adding additional dates columns into a fact table rather than creating a calendar table. This is poor data modelling.
Gayla
5 months agoAnissa
5 months agoQueenie
5 months agoAliza
5 months agoBernardine
5 months agoWillow
5 months agoRonnie
5 months agoWillow
5 months agoTerrilyn
5 months agoFrancoise
6 months agoGerald
6 months agoKaran
6 months agoPilar
6 months agoCallum F
4 years agokoorosh
4 years ago