Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 4 Question 105 Discussion

You need to assign 10 percent of the Qualification records to the QV queue through table configuration by using a Power Automate flow.What should you do?
A) Create an autonumber column on the Qualification table and assign its qualification records if the number cleanly divides by 10.
B) Create a calculated column on the Service Request table that sums the number of qualification records, generates a random number between zero and the number from the new field, and assigns each qualification record if the number generated is 10 percent or less of the value of the new field.
C) Create a roll-up column on the Service Request table that is the count of qualification records, generates a random number between zero and the number from the new field, and assigns each qualification record if the number generated is 10 percent or less of the value of the new field.
D) Create an autonumber column on the Service Request table and assign its qualification records if the number cleanly divides by 10.

Microsoft PL-200 Exam - Topic 4 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 4
[All PL-200 Questions]

You need to assign 10 percent of the Qualification records to the QV queue through table configuration by using a Power Automate flow.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elina at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pamella
25 days ago
C sounds good too, but B feels more dynamic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 month ago
I prefer option C. Roll-up columns are useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
1 month ago
It uses a random number, fits the 10 percent rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
1 month ago
Why B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
2 months ago
I think option B makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
2 months ago
This question is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
2 months ago
I agree with C, but I'm not sure about the random number part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
2 months ago
Wait, how does D even relate to the QV queue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
C sounds like a solid approach, I’d go with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
I think B is too complicated for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
3 months ago
Option A seems straightforward, but does it really work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
3 months ago
This question is making my head spin. Maybe I should just flip a coin?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
3 months ago
Option A is the clear winner here. Cleanly dividing by 10 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
4 months ago
D is the way to do it. Autonumber columns are the best for this kind of thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
4 months ago
I'm going with C. Sounds like a good way to get that 10% assignment done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
4 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Gotta love that random number generation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
4 months ago
I don't think option D is correct because it talks about the Service Request table, not the Qualification table, which seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
4 months ago
I feel like option C might be the way to go since it involves counting records, but I'm not entirely confident about the random number part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to use calculated columns, but I can't recall if that was the best method for assigning records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not sure if using an autonumber column is the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
5 months ago
This looks straightforward enough. I'm leaning towards option A since it seems the most direct way to randomly select 10% of the records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by mapping out the different table relationships and data points involved, then evaluate each option methodically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel