Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MS-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 4
[All MS-102 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the users shown in the following table.

You plan to create a Conditional Access policy that will use GPS-based named locations.

Which users can the policy protect?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Celia at Sep 17, 2024, 11:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Peggy
4 months ago
Totally agree with you, Natalie!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
4 months ago
Wait, can all those users really be protected? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
4 months ago
Definitely User1 and User3 only!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
4 months ago
I think it's just User2 and User4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
5 months ago
User1, User2, User3, and User4 can all be protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
5 months ago
I feel like it might just be User2 and User4, but I can't remember the details about how GPS-based policies work for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where only certain users were included based on their location settings. I wonder if that's the case here too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
5 months ago
I remember something about named locations being tied to specific user licenses, but I can't recall which users that affects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
5 months ago
I think the policy can protect all users, but I'm not entirely sure if there are restrictions based on their roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure how the GPS-based named locations work in the context of this policy. I'll need to review the details carefully and try to understand the relationship between the user information and the policy requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The policy is using GPS-based named locations, so it's likely looking at the users' locations. Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is D - the policy can protect all four users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. The question mentions GPS-based named locations, but the user details don't seem to include any location information. I'll need to think through this carefully to figure out which users the policy can protect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - the question is asking which users the Conditional Access policy can protect based on the given information. I'll need to carefully review the user details and the policy requirements to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I think it might be C, during the post-boot phase, but I'm not 100% confident. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
1 year ago
I'm scratching my head on this one. Are we sure User1 and User3 aren't secretly ninjas who can teleport? Gotta go with D to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
1 year ago
Haha, this is too easy! Of course, the answer is D. All four users can be protected by the policy. GPS is the way to go, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Flo
1 year ago
User3: Definitely, D is the correct answer. GPS is the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. GPS-based named locations can protect all of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. All four users can be protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'd go with B, User1 and User3 only, since they seem to be the ones with the most specific location-based requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Clarinda
1 year ago
Yeah, User2 and User4 are not mentioned in the location-based requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
1 year ago
I agree, User1 and User3 have the most specific location-based requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. User1 and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
1 year ago
But the question mentions GPS-based named locations, so it makes sense to protect User2 and User4 who are likely to be mobile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it can protect User1 and User3 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is D. User1, User2, User3, and User4 can all be protected by the Conditional Access policy using GPS-based named locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
1 year ago
Hmm, the policy can protect all users since they have the Microsoft 365 E5 subscription. But I wonder if User2 and User4 have certain geographical restrictions that the policy needs to address.
upvoted 0 times
Michel
1 year ago
User1 only
upvoted 0 times
...
India
1 year ago
User1, User2, User3, and User4
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
1 year ago
User2 and User4 only
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
User1 and User3 only
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
2 years ago
I think the policy can protect User2 and User4 only.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel