New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-700 Exam - Topic 3 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-700 exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 3
[All MB-700 Questions]

A utility company has the financial users. Two of the users need access to supply chain functionality.

You need to provide a licensing strategy for the utility company.

Which two licensing options should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Marta at Jul 05, 2024, 05:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Titus
3 months ago
Why would they need 20 licenses? Seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
3 months ago
B is a solid choice too, but I lean towards A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? I thought attach licenses were limited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
4 months ago
Totally agree, A and C make sense for supply chain access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
4 months ago
I think A and C are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
I believe we should definitely consider the number of users needing access. If only two need supply chain, maybe the attach licenses could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we need base or attach licenses for the supply chain users. I thought both could work, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between base and attach licenses. I feel like base licenses might be more appropriate for full functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
I remember that attach licenses are usually for users who need limited access, but I'm not sure if they apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
5 months ago
Sounds like a solid strategy, Devorah. I'll keep that in mind as I work through the question. Gotta make sure I select the right combination of licenses to cover all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I think the best approach would be to purchase the Dynamics 365 Finance base licenses for the financial users, and then the Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management attach licenses for the two users who need that functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between base and attach licenses. I'll need to review the licensing details to make sure I understand the implications of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky licensing question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
5 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. We have financial users and two users who need supply chain functionality. I think the key is finding the right mix of licenses to cover everyone's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
5 months ago
I think the salience model is about grouping stakeholders based on their power, urgency, and legitimacy, as described in option D. That seems to fit the description of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure, but didn't we practice something similar? Maybe the Cisco XCP Connection Manager log could also be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
2 years ago
I believe purchasing 18 Dynamics 365 Finance base licenses would be a waste of resources in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
2 years ago
I agree with Tran. It makes sense to provide access to the specific functionality needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 years ago
B and C all the way! Attach licenses are the way to go, my friend. That way we're not overpaying for a bunch of stuff we don't need. And who knows, maybe we can even use those extra licenses to bribe the IT guy. Just kidding, of course. Or am I?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
2 years ago
This is a tough one. I'm going to go with D and E just to be on the safe side. Better to have a few extra licenses than to run out, am I right? Although, I do like the idea of only paying for what we need... Hmm, maybe I should rethink this.
upvoted 0 times
Boris
2 years ago
Okay, let's go with B and C then. It makes more sense financially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
2 years ago
That's true, it could save us money in the long run. Let's reconsider our choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 years ago
But what about only paying for what we need? Maybe B and C would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 years ago
I think D and E are good choices. It's always better to have extra licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tran
2 years ago
I think we should recommend purchasing two Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management attach licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
2 years ago
B and C for sure. Why buy the base licenses when we can just get the attach licenses and save some money? Plus, then we only pay for what we actually need. Smart move in my book.
upvoted 0 times
Glenna
1 year ago
It's important to consider the specific needs of the users when deciding on the licensing strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
1 year ago
Definitely, it's a more cost-effective option for the utility company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
1 year ago
I agree, buying the attach licenses for the supply chain functionality makes more sense financially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
It's a smart move to save money by opting for the attach licenses instead of the base licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 years ago
Definitely, it's a cost-effective solution to only purchase what is needed for those specific users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
2 years ago
I agree, buying the attach licenses for supply chain functionality makes more sense financially.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
2 years ago
Definitely, it's a cost-effective solution for the utility company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
2 years ago
I agree, buying the attach licenses for supply chain functionality makes more sense financially.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veta
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe we should just buy the base licenses, that way we don't have to worry about attach licenses. Although, I do like the idea of only paying for what we need. Decisions, decisions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 years ago
I think B and C would be the best options. Finance attach licenses for the financial users and Supply Chain Management attach licenses for the supply chain functionality users.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
2 years ago
Exactly, that way both the financial users and supply chain functionality users will have the access they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
2 years ago
So, we should recommend purchasing 18 Dynamics 365 Finance attach licenses and two Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management attach licenses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 years ago
That makes sense, Finance attach licenses for the financial users and Supply Chain Management attach licenses for the supply chain functionality users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
2 years ago
I agree, B and C would be the best options for the utility company.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel