New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MB-700 Exam - Topic 3 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-700 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 3
[All MB-700 Questions]

A company uses Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management and has two legal entities that distribute the same items. One of the legal entities uses advanced warehouse management.

New items that are created must meet the business needs of both companies and allow for consolidated analytics.

You need to recommend a master data management strategy to standardize the item master and meet the business requirements.

What should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Olen
4 months ago
Surprised that creating the same item number in E is even an option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
4 months ago
Option A could work too, but it might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
5 months ago
Not sure about B, what if the entities have different needs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
5 months ago
Totally agree, B makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
5 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
5 months ago
I feel like option D might be overcomplicating things with advanced warehouse setups. I’m leaning towards option B for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about item templates being important for analytics. Maybe option A could work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar since we discussed using Common Data Management for standardizing data across entities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
5 months ago
I recall a practice question where we had to avoid duplicate item numbers across companies. So, option C seems wrong to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The answer is B - enabling host build reserve and a minimum cluster of 4 vSAN nodes. That should provide good failover protection while staying within the budget constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The program governance board member has influence, so maybe it's best to just go with their recommendation and engage the vendor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel