New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft MB-700 Exam - Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-700 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 1
[All MB-700 Questions]

A company uses the vendor collaboration functionality within Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management.

You must grant an external vendor permission to collaborate with the company. The system must send the vendor an invitation email. Emails must be sent to work email addresses only.

You need to configure user access

Which two actions should you perform? Each correct answer presents part of the solution

NOTE Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Miesha
3 months ago
Just to clarify, emails must be work addresses only, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
4 months ago
I think separation of duties is important too, but not sure it's needed here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
4 months ago
Wait, do we really need a new Azure tenant for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
4 months ago
Agree, assigning user roles is also a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
4 months ago
You definitely need to provision a vendor user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about separation of duties. I don’t think it applies directly to this scenario, but I might be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
Creating a new Azure Active Directory tenant seems unnecessary for just granting access. I feel like it’s more about user roles and provisioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
5 months ago
I remember something about assigning user roles from a practice question, but I can't recall if that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
5 months ago
I think we need to provision a vendor user, but I'm not entirely sure about the second action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
5 months ago
Provisioning the vendor user and assigning roles seem straightforward, but I'm not sure about the email invitation part. I'll need to double-check the details on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key things here are provisioning the vendor user and assigning the right roles. I'll need to make sure I understand the separation of duties requirements as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the steps needed to grant the vendor access and set up the email invitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I'll start by provisioning the vendor user, then assign the necessary roles. The email invitation should be a simple setup as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is B, forward proxy. This component would be used to distribute the traffic across the scaled-out firewalls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward - Google Analytics is the clear choice for measuring the effectiveness of a digital marketing plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the different departments and how they contribute to compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The question is asking about what component of a governance system translates desired behavior into practical guidance. I'm leaning towards B - Principles, policies and frameworks since that seems to be the link between the desired behavior and the actual guidance. But I want to double-check my reasoning on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
Definitely. And assigning user roles will help manage permissions effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
2 years ago
Setting up separation of duties is important to ensure proper access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
2 years ago
I agree with Marlon. We also need to provision a vendor user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 years ago
I think we need to create a new Azure Active Directory tenant to start off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 years ago
Alright, so provisioning a vendor user and assigning user roles should be enough then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
No, we only need to set up separation of duties, not create a new tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 years ago
Should we create a new Azure Active Directory tenant as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 years ago
Yes, that makes sense. We also need to assign user roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
I think we need to provision a vendor user for access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 years ago
Exactly! And don't forget, the email needs to go to the vendor's work email address. I wonder if they'll ask us to configure that in the exam as well. *chuckles* Gotta love those little details they throw in there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 years ago
Good point, Joanne. It's always better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to security and access management. But I agree, C and D seem to be the winning combination here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
2 years ago
I agree with you both. Provisioning the vendor user and assigning the appropriate roles are the key steps here. We want to make sure the vendor can access the required functionality, but not more than they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
2 years ago
Haha, yeah, the sledgehammer to crack a nut comment is spot on. Although, I do have to say, if this was a real-life scenario, I'd probably double-check the separation of duties just to be sure. You know, cover all our bases and whatnot.
upvoted 0 times
Penney
2 years ago
Assigning user roles is also important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 years ago
And don't forget to provision a vendor user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 years ago
We should definitely set up separation of duties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. Better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
2 years ago
You're right, that's the core of the question. I think the correct actions would be to provision a vendor user (C) and assign user roles (D). We don't need to create a new Azure Active Directory tenant (A), and setting up separation of duties (B) doesn't seem directly relevant to this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
2 years ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key here is to understand the vendor collaboration functionality in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. We need to grant the vendor permission to collaborate, and the system should send them an invitation email to their work email address.
upvoted 0 times
Loreen
2 years ago
D) Assign user roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franklyn
2 years ago
You guys are right, C and D are the way to go. I mean, who would even consider setting up a whole new Azure AD tenant just to invite a vendor to collaborate? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 years ago
Hold up, why would we need to create a new Azure Active Directory tenant? That seems like overkill for this scenario. I'm pretty sure the answer is C and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 years ago
I agree, this question doesn't seem too complicated. I'm leaning more towards C and D as the correct answer. Provisioning a vendor user and assigning user roles seems like the logical steps to take here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems pretty straightforward. Let's see, we need to grant an external vendor permission to collaborate with the company, and the system should send the vendor an invitation email to their work email address. I'm thinking the answer has to be either C and D, or maybe C and B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel