Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-500 Exam - Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 2
[All MB-500 Questions]

You have a table in which multiple properties must be changed. Multiple table properties are locked down at the base table and must not be overwritten.

You need to modify the table properties by extending the table.

Which table property can you populate in a table extension by using the property sheet?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Billy at Sep 18, 2024, 02:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Charlene
3 months ago
Table group is also restricted, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
3 months ago
I thought you could change the Configuration key too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
3 months ago
Definitely agree, Cache lookup is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
3 months ago
You can modify the Cache lookup property in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
4 months ago
Surprised that Created by is locked down, never knew!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards "Created by," but I’m not confident. I feel like we discussed how some properties are restricted in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
4 months ago
I have a vague recollection that "Cache lookup" is something we can set in a table extension, but it seems too specific for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like "Configuration key" might be the right answer, but it could also be locked down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
I think the property we can modify in a table extension is the "Table group," but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is clear, and the answer options give me a good sense of what's possible with table extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
5 months ago
Based on the options provided, I think the answer is B. Table group seems like the most likely property that can be populated in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'm not sure exactly what they mean by "extending the table" and how that relates to the property sheet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question says the properties are locked down at the base table, so I'll need to focus on what can be changed in the extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about which table properties can be modified in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. IPAM would make sense since it can help automate IP address management, which is a common administrative task. NAC could also be relevant for controlling access to the devices and services. I'm leaning towards IPAM, but I'll need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
Probably A) Created by. I mean, why not? It's not like the other options are any more exciting. *yawns*
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
9 months ago
I'm sticking with A) Created by. It just seems like the most logical choice for a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
10 months ago
Actually, I believe it's D) Clustered index. That's the one you can change in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
10 months ago
No, I'm pretty sure it's B) Table group. That's the property you can modify in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
I think it's C) Configuration key. That's the one you can populate in a table extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Clustered index could also be a possible answer for extending the table properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
11 months ago
B) Table group, for sure. I mean, who doesn't love a good table group extension, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Josue
10 months ago
B) Table group, for sure. I mean, who doesn't love a good table group extension, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
11 months ago
A) Created by
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyssa
11 months ago
I agree with Markus, because Configuration key can be populated in a table extension without overwriting locked down properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
11 months ago
Definitely C) Configuration key. I've dealt with this kind of thing before, and that's the only property you can really extend without overwriting the base table.
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
10 months ago
D) Clustered index
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
11 months ago
C) Configuration key
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
11 months ago
B) Table group
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
11 months ago
A) Created by
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
11 months ago
Hmm, I think it's gotta be C) Configuration key. That's the only one that seems to fit the description of being locked down at the base table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
12 months ago
I think the answer is C) Configuration key.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel