Microsoft MB-335 Exam - Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-335 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 2

A company produces generic and name-brand paper plates in the same factory using standard costing and unrig the same Bill of materials and routes to produce both product.

The finance and production teams want a way to new individual raw material consumption costs in the ledger.

You need to add a production group to tie finished good to control postings to the ledger. What should you do?

AUpdate the cost of the generic finished good item.

BCreate a production pool tor the finished good item.

CCreate a production group for the finished good item.

DCreate a new Bill of materials with alternate cons for the raw material.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Janella at Jul 10, 2025, 03:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-335 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Melodie

2 months ago

Wait, can you really just create a new Bill of materials like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Willie

3 months ago

I think updating the cost directly is simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

3 months ago

Definitely need that production group for better tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

3 months ago

A production pool might complicate things more than necessary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

3 months ago

Sounds like a production group is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nguyet

4 months ago

I think updating the cost of the finished good item could be a simpler solution, but I see the value in creating a production group too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abel

4 months ago

I feel like I might be mixing up production pools and production groups. Is a production group really the right choice here?

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

4 months ago

This question seems similar to one we practiced about cost allocation. I think creating a production group makes sense for tracking costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mable

4 months ago

I remember we discussed production groups in class, but I'm not entirely sure how they tie into the ledger postings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elly

4 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C - create a production group for the finished good item. That seems like the most straightforward way to address the issue they're describing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

5 months ago

Okay, I've read through the question a few times now, and I think the key is to create a production group for the finished good item. That should help tie the raw material costs to the final product.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eugene

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little confused by the wording here. I need to make sure I understand exactly what they're asking before I try to answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

5 months ago

This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can work through it. Let me think this through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

7 months ago

I think creating a production pool for the finished good item could also be a good option to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Owen

7 months ago

I see your point, Dorsey, but creating a production group seems like a more comprehensive solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

7 months ago

But wouldn't updating the cost of the generic finished good item also solve the issue?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

7 months ago

I agree with Owen, creating a production group would help tie the finished good to control postings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

7 months ago

Haha, this is a real head-scratcher, isn't it? Maybe we should just toss a coin and see where it lands. Or, you know, consult a ouija board or something. Can't be any worse than our current options.

upvoted 0 times

Melynda

5 months ago

A) Update the cost of the generic finished good item.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thora

7 months ago

Wait, wait, wait. What if we create a new Bill of materials with alternate costs for the raw material? That could work, right? Gotta think outside the box!

upvoted 0 times

Annmarie

5 months ago

A) Update the cost of the generic finished good item.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenor

7 months ago

Honestly, I'm a little confused. Why don't we just update the cost of the generic finished good item? Seems like the simplest fix to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linwood

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to create a production pool for the finished good item instead? That seems like a more straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

Wilburn

7 months ago

User 2: I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to create a production pool for the finished good item instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherry

7 months ago

User 1: I think we should update the cost of the generic finished good item.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

8 months ago

I think option C is the way to go. Creating a production group for the finished good item will help tie the finished good to the control postings in the ledger.

upvoted 0 times

Herminia

7 months ago

I agree, creating a production group is the way to go for accurate cost tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

7 months ago

Option C is the best choice. It will help link the finished good to the ledger.

upvoted 0 times

...

Owen

8 months ago

I think we should create a production group for the finished good item.

upvoted 0 times

...