Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-335 Exam - Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

A company produces generic and name-brand paper plates in the same factory using standard costing and unrig the same Bill of materials and routes to produce both product.The finance and production teams want a way to new individual raw material consumption costs in the ledger.You need to add a production group to tie finished good to control postings to the ledger. What should you do?
C) Create a production group for the finished good item.
A) Update the cost of the generic finished good item.
B) Create a production pool tor the finished good item.
D) Create a new Bill of materials with alternate cons for the raw material.

Microsoft MB-335 Exam - Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-335 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 2
[All MB-335 Questions]

A company produces generic and name-brand paper plates in the same factory using standard costing and unrig the same Bill of materials and routes to produce both product.

The finance and production teams want a way to new individual raw material consumption costs in the ledger.

You need to add a production group to tie finished good to control postings to the ledger. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Janella at Jul 10, 2025, 03:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-335 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melodie
6 months ago
Wait, can you really just create a new Bill of materials like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
6 months ago
I think updating the cost directly is simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
6 months ago
Definitely need that production group for better tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
6 months ago
A production pool might complicate things more than necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
6 months ago
Sounds like a production group is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
7 months ago
I think updating the cost of the finished good item could be a simpler solution, but I see the value in creating a production group too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
7 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up production pools and production groups. Is a production group really the right choice here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
7 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced about cost allocation. I think creating a production group makes sense for tracking costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
7 months ago
I remember we discussed production groups in class, but I'm not entirely sure how they tie into the ledger postings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C - create a production group for the finished good item. That seems like the most straightforward way to address the issue they're describing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
8 months ago
Okay, I've read through the question a few times now, and I think the key is to create a production group for the finished good item. That should help tie the raw material costs to the final product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused by the wording here. I need to make sure I understand exactly what they're asking before I try to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
8 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can work through it. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
I think creating a production pool for the finished good item could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
10 months ago
I see your point, Dorsey, but creating a production group seems like a more comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
10 months ago
But wouldn't updating the cost of the generic finished good item also solve the issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
10 months ago
I agree with Owen, creating a production group would help tie the finished good to control postings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
10 months ago
Haha, this is a real head-scratcher, isn't it? Maybe we should just toss a coin and see where it lands. Or, you know, consult a ouija board or something. Can't be any worse than our current options.
upvoted 0 times
Melynda
8 months ago
A) Update the cost of the generic finished good item.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thora
10 months ago
Wait, wait, wait. What if we create a new Bill of materials with alternate costs for the raw material? That could work, right? Gotta think outside the box!
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
8 months ago
A) Update the cost of the generic finished good item.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenor
10 months ago
Honestly, I'm a little confused. Why don't we just update the cost of the generic finished good item? Seems like the simplest fix to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to create a production pool for the finished good item instead? That seems like a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Wilburn
10 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to create a production pool for the finished good item instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
10 months ago
User 1: I think we should update the cost of the generic finished good item.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
11 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Creating a production group for the finished good item will help tie the finished good to the control postings in the ledger.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
10 months ago
I agree, creating a production group is the way to go for accurate cost tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
10 months ago
Option C is the best choice. It will help link the finished good to the ledger.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
11 months ago
I think we should create a production group for the finished good item.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel