Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft MB-310 Exam - Topic 5 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 107
Topic #: 5
[All MB-310 Questions]

The Canadian franchise purchases excess ski equipment from the US franchise. Two sets of skis are

purchased totaling USD1,000.

When the purchase invoice is prepared, USD10,000 is keyed in by mistake.

Which configuration determines the result for this intercompany trade scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Shawnda at Sep 17, 2024, 06:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-310 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheron
4 months ago
Isn't it surprising that they didn't catch that before posting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
4 months ago
I think B makes sense too, matching totals is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
4 months ago
Wait, how does a typo like that even happen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
Definitely option A, approval is a must for discrepancies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
5 months ago
The invoice was way off, that's a big mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
5 months ago
I feel like allowing discrepancies with a warning could lead to issues, but I can't recall if that's the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
5 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where discrepancies were flagged for approval. I wonder if option A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the three-way match policy could help catch that kind of error before it gets posted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of matching invoice totals in class. I think that might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the different match policy options and think about how they would apply in this intercompany trade situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The three-way match policy is the most comprehensive option, so that's likely the right configuration for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is figuring out how the system handles discrepancies between the invoice total and the actual purchase amount. I'll focus on the "Post invoices with discrepancies" and "Match invoice totals" settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to make sure I understand the intercompany trade scenario before I can decide on the right configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think about the different configuration options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The Daily Scrum is supposed to be a quick check-in, but I can't remember the exact time limit. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
10 months ago
I'm going to have to go with C on this one. Three-way match policy is the way to go - it'll catch that $10,000 discrepancy faster than a ski bunny on a black diamond slope!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of intercompany trade. I bet the person who made that $10,000 mistake is sweating bullets right about now. No way they're passing the 'Three-way match policy' with that one!
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
9 months ago
I agree, mistakes like that can really mess up the whole process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
9 months ago
Definitely, they should make sure to double-check everything before submitting invoices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
10 months ago
Oops, that's a big mistake. They better fix that before it causes any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
10 months ago
Hmm, E looks tempting. 'Post invoices with discrepancies is set to allow with warning' - that way, I can still get this purchase through, even with a silly typo. As long as it's just a warning, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
10 months ago
I'm going with B. If 'Match invoice totals' is set to yes, the system will catch that $10,000 discrepancy right away. Wouldn't want to be the one who keyed in that wrong amount!
upvoted 0 times
Gary
10 months ago
Definitely! It's crucial to have checks in place to prevent costly errors in intercompany trades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
10 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have that setting to avoid errors like that $10,000 mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
10 months ago
I think B is the correct option. The system will catch the discrepancy if 'Match invoice totals' is set to yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noe
11 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Three-way match policy ensures the purchase order, receipt, and invoice all match up. No way this mistake gets through unnoticed!
upvoted 0 times
Cletus
11 months ago
Yeah, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to financial transactions. Three-way match policy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
11 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely the safest choice. We can't risk any discrepancies in the invoices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
11 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. We should double check the configuration to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Post invoices with discrepancies is set to require approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Two-way match policy is configured.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel