Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-700 Exam - Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All AZ-700 Questions]

You plan to implement an Azure virtual network that will contain 10 virtual subnets. The subnets will use IPv6 addresses. Each subnet will host up to 200 load-balanced virtual machines.

You need to recommend a load balancing solution for the virtual network. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* The virtual machines and the load balancer must be accessible only from the virtual network.

* Costs must be minimized.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Xuan at Feb 08, 2024, 05:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Meghann
4 months ago
I’m not sure about the Basic option, might need more features for future scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
4 months ago
Totally agree with Tula, it meets the requirements perfectly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
4 months ago
Wait, can the Basic Load Balancer handle 200 VMs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
4 months ago
I think Azure Standard Load Balancer is a better choice for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
5 months ago
Basic Azure Load Balancer is cost-effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
5 months ago
I think the Basic Azure Load Balancer is the most straightforward option here, but I wonder if it can handle the load of 200 VMs efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the Application Gateway options. I feel like they might be overkill for just internal load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to consider the accessibility of the load balancer. I think the Standard Load Balancer could be a better fit for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
5 months ago
I think the Basic Azure Load Balancer might be the right choice since it’s cost-effective, but I’m not sure if it meets all the requirements for IPv6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
The key here is finding the most cost-effective solution that still meets the accessibility requirement. I think the Azure Standard Load Balancer is the way to go, as it's a more basic and affordable option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
5 months ago
Based on the requirements, I'm leaning towards the Azure Application Gateway v2. It seems to meet the accessibility and cost criteria, and it should handle the IPv6 addressing well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The virtual machines and load balancer need to be accessible only from the virtual network, and costs need to be minimized. I'm thinking the Azure Standard Load Balancer might be the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around accessibility and cost minimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the IPv6 requirement. Does that change the load balancing solution we should consider? I'll need to research how IPv6 impacts the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
6 months ago
I'm pretty sure Jenkins is built in Java, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the differences between a programme, project, and portfolio. Let me re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the different accounting functions within a company. I'll focus on recalling the key responsibilities of each function to determine which one is responsible for statutory accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
6 months ago
I've got a good feeling about B, examination. That's where we really dig into the data and use forensic tools to extract the relevant information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 years ago
Well, it looks like we have different opinions. We should carefully analyze the features and costs of each option before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
2 years ago
I personally would go with Azure Application Gateway v2, I think it offers more advanced features that could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think Azure Standard Load Balancer is more cost-effective for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
2 years ago
But what about Azure Application Gateway v2? Wouldn't that also meet the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
I agree, Azure Standard Load Balancer seems like the best option to ensure accessibility and minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 years ago
I think we should go with Azure Standard Load Balancer for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 years ago
I think Basic Azure Load Balancer might be the most cost-effective option for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but maybe Azure Standard Load Balancer could also work for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
2 years ago
I agree, Azure Application Gateway v2 would be a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
2 years ago
I think we should go with Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2 for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
2 years ago
You raise a good point, but the requirement to minimize costs is a big factor here. The Application Gateway, especially the v2 version, is going to be more expensive than the Standard Load Balancer. If we can get the job done with the Standard Load Balancer, I think that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 years ago
Hold on, I'm not so sure. The question mentions 'load-balanced virtual machines', which makes me think the Application Gateway might be a better fit. It provides more advanced load balancing and traffic management features than the basic Standard Load Balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 years ago
I agree with you, the Standard Load Balancer seems like the way to go. It's designed to work within a virtual network, and it's a more cost-effective solution than the Application Gateway. Plus, I heard the Standard Load Balancer can handle IPv6 traffic, which is a must for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 years ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key here is to focus on the requirements - the virtual machines and load balancer must be accessible only from the virtual network, and we need to minimize costs. Based on that, I would say option C, the Azure Standard Load Balancer, is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
Marget
2 years ago
So, it looks like we are all in agreement that Azure Standard Load Balancer is the right choice for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 years ago
Definitely, we need to make sure the solution meets all the necessary criteria while keeping costs optimized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
2 years ago
That makes sense. It's important to consider both the requirements and cost when choosing a load balancing solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 years ago
No, I don't think Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2 are the best choice here. They might be more expensive and not as suitable for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 years ago
What about the other options like Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2? Do you think they could also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 years ago
I agree, the Azure Standard Load Balancer seems like the most cost-effective option that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
2 years ago
Option C, the Azure Standard Load Balancer, is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel