You use Azure Pipelines to build and release application code, The pipelines include validation tests that must be completed successfully before deployment proceeds from the test stage to production.
You discover inconsistent test outcomes for the same source code.
You need to validate the test logic.
What should you do?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium AZ-400 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
CH
Cherry
11 months ago
Flaky tests can be a real pain, good call on detection!
DE
Denny
11 months ago
Wait, can you really install an Analytics extension for this?
BR
Brandon
12 months ago
Decreasing the test pass rate? That sounds risky!
NI
Nichelle
12 months ago
Not sure about that, parallel test runners could help too.
YU
Yun
1 year ago
I think enabling flaky test detection is the way to go.
DA
Dacia
1 year ago
I vaguely recall something about the Analytics extension, but I don't think it specifically validates test logic.
CH
Christene
1 year ago
I feel like enabling flaky test detection could be the best option since it directly addresses inconsistent outcomes.
TH
Thad
1 year ago
I think configuring a parallel test runner might help, but it seems more like a performance improvement than a validation step.
JO
Josephine
1 year ago
I remember something about flaky tests, but I'm not sure if enabling detection is the right approach here.
KE
Kenny
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully and make sure I don't miss any of the correct answers.
ED
Edwin
1 year ago
I was leaning toward call records and log files, but I'm feeling uncertain about whether IP addresses are included or not.
CA
Carri
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the first program started by the Linux kernel, and it's using the SysV init system. I'm pretty sure the answer is /sbin/init, but I'll review my notes just to be sure.
KR
Kristel
1 year ago
I thought there was something specific about needing RD and RT to match on remote PE routers. Is that what option B is saying?