Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-305 Exam - Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You plan to move a web application named App! from an on-premises data center to Azure.

App1 depends on a custom COM component that is installed on the host server.

You need to recommend a solution to host App1 in Azure. The solution must meet the following requirements:

App1 must be available to users if an Azure data center becomes unavailable.

Costs must be minimized.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Miesha at Sep 17, 2024, 08:46 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tiffiny
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, load balancers are key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
4 months ago
Wait, can a web app even support a COM component?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
4 months ago
D is the way to go for minimizing costs with zones!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
4 months ago
I think B is better since it uses a web app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
5 months ago
Option A seems solid for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
5 months ago
I think deploying across availability zones is a good strategy for minimizing downtime, but I’m not certain if that’s the most cost-effective option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between a virtual machine scale set and a web app in this context. Which one is better for hosting a COM component?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to ensure redundancy across regions. I think a load balancer is definitely needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of high availability in Azure, but I'm not sure if a web app can support a custom COM component.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I can solve this one. The virtual machine scale set and load balancer across two regions is the way to go. That will ensure high availability and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good strategy here. I'll focus on the key requirements - high availability and cost minimization. The Traffic Manager and web app option seems like it could be a good fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the custom COM component. How would that work in an Azure environment? I'll need to research the options for hosting that kind of component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about high availability and cost optimization for a web app in Azure. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the available options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are a few different AWS services that could potentially work, but I'm not sure which one best meets all the requirements. I'll need to carefully review the details and compare the features of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
10 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'custom COM component'? Looks like we're in for a wild ride! I hope the Azure team has a good sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
Lorrie
9 months ago
C) In two Azure regions, deploy a load balancer and a web app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
9 months ago
B) In two Azure regions, deploy a Traffic Manager profile and a web app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
10 months ago
A) In two Azure regions, deploy a load balancer and a virtual machine scale set.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The load balancer should help with failover, and a web app seems like the most cost-effective solution for a simple app like this.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
9 months ago
That's true, but a load balancer can also help with distributing traffic and ensuring high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
9 months ago
But wouldn't deploying a Traffic Manager profile provide better failover capabilities?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
10 months ago
I agree, a web app should be cost-effective for hosting App1 in Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
11 months ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. The load balancer can help with high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyndy
11 months ago
Hmm, Option D seems to address the availability requirement, but what about the cost minimization? I need to do some more research on the pricing of virtual machine scale sets vs. web apps.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, but we should research the pricing of virtual machine scale sets vs. web apps for cost minimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
10 months ago
User 1: Option D seems to address the availability requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
11 months ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
11 months ago
Option B looks promising, but I'm not sure how the custom COM component will work with a web app. Might need to dig deeper into that.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
10 months ago
Good idea, we don't want any surprises when moving App1 to Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
10 months ago
Maybe we should investigate further before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
10 months ago
I agree, but we need to make sure the custom COM component will work with a web app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for hosting App1 in Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
12 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel