Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-204 Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-204 Questions]

You are developing a road tollway tracking application that sends tracking events by using Azure Event Hubs using premium tier.

Each road must have a throttling policy uniquely assigned.

You need to configure the event hub to allow for per-road throttling.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Ashley at Apr 22, 2024, 02:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-204 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lillian
6 months ago
I disagree, application groups don't seem relevant for throttling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
6 months ago
Surprised there's no mention of rate limits here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
6 months ago
Isn't it better to store events in different partitions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
7 months ago
I think using unique consumer groups is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
7 months ago
A unique connection string for each road sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
7 months ago
I vaguely remember that application groups are more about managing access rather than throttling, so I don't think that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage different data streams, and I feel like partitioning might be important, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
7 months ago
I think using a unique consumer group for each road could help manage the throttling, but I need to double-check if that's how it works with Event Hubs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
8 months ago
I remember something about using unique connection strings for different services, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for throttling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
8 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at. The per-road throttling requirement means we need to be able to control the throughput for each individual road. Option D, using a different partition for each road, seems like the most straightforward way to achieve that. I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question mentions using the premium tier of Event Hubs, but none of the options seem to directly address that. I'll need to review the Event Hubs documentation to make sure I understand the capabilities of the premium tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
8 months ago
Alright, this looks straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is A - using a unique connection string for each road should allow for the per-road throttling, right? I'll mark that one down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to find a way to isolate the events for each road so they can be throttled independently. I'm leaning towards option B or D, but I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to the per-road throttling requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
8 months ago
I think the answer is A - the MC uses a REST endpoint to query the server. That seems like the most logical way for it to identify the server roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the Cisco UCS server models. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
The key here is understanding the hierarchy. I think the highest level that impacts accounting is the Ledger, so I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
8 months ago
I feel like using the Service Loose Coupling principle could help, but I need to make sure we're also addressing the ownership conflict between the IT departments. This question is tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
2 years ago
Good point. Using a unique consumer group sounds more practical for per-road throttling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 years ago
But wouldn't that make it difficult to manage and monitor each road's throttling individually?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
2 years ago
I believe ensuring each road has a unique connection string is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 years ago
Well, using a unique consumer group allows us to control the consumption rate for each road separately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 years ago
Why do you think that's the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 years ago
I think we should use a unique consumer group for each road.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
2 years ago
I think we should also ensure each road stores events in a different partition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 years ago
No, we should use a unique consumer group for each road.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
2 years ago
Should we ensure each road has a unique connection string?
upvoted 0 times
Davida
2 years ago
Definitely, it's the best way to configure per-road throttling on Azure Event Hubs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 years ago
And it will make it easier to manage the tracking for each road.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 years ago
Exactly, it will allow us to control the flow of events per road.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
2 years ago
That makes sense, it will help with throttling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
2 years ago
No, we should use a unique consumer group for each road.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel