Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AZ-120 Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 2
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You have an Azure subscription and an Enterprise Agreement (EA).

You plan to deploy an SAP on Azure production landscape that will contain the following virtual machines:

* One M-series virtual machine with 128 cores

* 15 E-series virtual machines with a total of 300 cores

* 10 D-series virtual machines with a total of 160 cores

During the deployment of the E-series virtual machines, you receive the following error message.

Operation results in exceeding quota limits of Core.

You need to ensure you can complete the E-series virtual machine deployment. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Maintain the performance of the SAP landscape.

* Minimize administrative effort.

* Minimize costs.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Shanice at Mar 07, 2025, 12:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-120 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Craig
5 months ago
Resizing VMs might help, but it could affect performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
5 months ago
Surprised there's a core limit with that setup, seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
5 months ago
Definitely not converting to PAYG, that’ll just increase costs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 months ago
I think splitting the VMs into a second subscription could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
6 months ago
Just request a quota increase, it's the easiest fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
6 months ago
I’m not confident, but converting to PAYG seems like it might complicate things more than necessary. I’d probably go with option D too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
6 months ago
I feel like resizing the VMs could impact performance, which we want to avoid. I’m leaning towards option D for the quota increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
6 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where splitting resources across subscriptions helped with limits. Maybe option B could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
6 months ago
I remember something about quotas in Azure, but I'm not sure if requesting a quota increase is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
6 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option B is the best solution - splitting the VMs across two subscriptions. That way, we can maximize our resources and stay within the quota limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
6 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan. I'll start by looking into option C - resizing the VMs. That could help us meet the performance requirements while minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
6 months ago
Hmm, the quota issue is a bit of a roadblock. I'm thinking option D might be the way to go, but I'll need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the options presented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 year ago
I see your point, Barb. Let's go ahead and request the quota increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
1 year ago
That could work too, but I think requesting a quota increase would be more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 year ago
But wouldn't resizing the D-series and E-series virtual machines also work to meet the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
1 year ago
You know, I bet the person who wrote this question was just sitting there, cackling to themselves, thinking 'Let's see how many people try to come up with some convoluted solution!' But D is clearly the right answer. Sometimes the simplest solution is the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
1 year ago
Option C is tempting, but resizing the VMs could have unintended consequences for the SAP landscape. I agree with Youlanda - D is the way to go. A quota increase is the simplest and most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
1 year ago
Haha, I'm pretty sure the answer is not B. Splitting the VMs across two subscriptions? That's like trying to put all your eggs in two baskets - it's just going to make things more complicated. D is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
My
12 months ago
Definitely, that seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
12 months ago
Yeah, it's better to just request a quota increase for the Azure region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
12 months ago
I agree, splitting the VMs across two subscriptions sounds like a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dulce
1 year ago
I agree with Barb, that seems like the best option to ensure we can complete the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
I think the correct answer here is D. Requesting a quota increase for the Azure region is the best way to maintain the performance of the SAP landscape while minimizing administrative effort and costs. Resizing the virtual machines could impact performance, and creating a second subscription would just add more overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawna
1 year ago
Agreed. Requesting a quota increase seems like the most efficient solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
That makes sense. It's important to ensure we have enough resources to deploy the virtual machines needed for the SAP landscape.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
1 year ago
I think the correct answer here is D. Requesting a quota increase for the Azure region is the best way to maintain the performance of the SAP landscape while minimizing administrative effort and costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barb
1 year ago
I think we should request a quota increase for the Azure region.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel