Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AI-900 Exam - Topic 4 Question 77 Discussion

Which Azure Al Document Intelligence prebuilt model should you use to extract parties and jurisdictions from a legal document?
C) general document
A) contract
B) layout
D) read

Microsoft AI-900 Exam - Topic 4 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-900 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 4
[All AI-900 Questions]

Which Azure Al Document Intelligence prebuilt model should you use to extract parties and jurisdictions from a legal document?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lemuel at Sep 18, 2024, 09:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-900 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jeff
6 months ago
I thought B might work too, but I guess it’s not as focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
6 months ago
100% agree, A is the way to go for extracting parties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
7 months ago
Wait, can you really use A for jurisdictions? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
7 months ago
I think A is right too, it’s specifically for legal docs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
7 months ago
Definitely A, the contract model is made for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
7 months ago
The read model seems too basic for extracting specific entities like parties and jurisdictions. I think it’s not the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards the general document model, but I recall it being less specific for legal contexts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question about document types, and I feel like the layout model was more about formatting rather than content extraction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
8 months ago
I think the contract model might be the right choice since it deals specifically with legal documents, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
8 months ago
Based on the question, I'd go with the "read" model. It sounds like it might be the best option for extracting specific details like parties and jurisdictions from a legal document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options don't seem to clearly match the task described in the question. I'll need to review the documentation on each of these models to make a more informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. The question specifically mentions "parties and jurisdictions", so I'm thinking the "contract" model might be a better fit since it's likely more tailored for that type of information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
8 months ago
I think the "general document" model would be the best choice here, as it seems to be the most broad and comprehensive option for extracting information from legal documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
8 months ago
The date and time of service status sounds familiar, but I don't know if that's offered here. Similar questions in practice quizzes were confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
2 years ago
I'm confident that C) general document is the way to go. It's the model that seems most tailored for this type of task.
upvoted 0 times
Madelyn
2 years ago
Have you tried using D) read for this task? It might also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
I agree, C) general document seems like the best fit for extracting parties and jurisdictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 years ago
I think A) contract might be more specific for legal documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 years ago
I'm going with B) layout. If it's a legal document, the layout is probably key to extracting the important information.
upvoted 0 times
Tonette
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) read might be a more general option for extracting information from any type of document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
2 years ago
I agree, A) contract could work well too. It's important to consider the specific needs of the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
2 years ago
I think A) contract might also be a good choice, since it's specifically for legal documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 years ago
I'm going with B) layout. If it's a legal document, the layout is probably key to extracting the important information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edward
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) read because you need to extract information from the document.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 years ago
D) read looks promising, but I'm not sure if it's specifically designed for legal documents. C) general document might be the safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
Brice
2 years ago
C) general document is a safe choice, it's designed to handle a variety of document types including legal documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 years ago
D) read might be worth trying out, it could potentially work well for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 years ago
A) contract could also be a good option for extracting parties and jurisdictions from legal documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Almeta
2 years ago
I agree with Rickie, the parties and jurisdictions are usually mentioned in a contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) general document. It seems like the most comprehensive model for extracting parties and jurisdictions from a legal document.
upvoted 0 times
Arlean
2 years ago
I agree, the general document prebuilt model is designed to handle a wide range of document types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) general document. It seems like the most comprehensive model for extracting parties and jurisdictions from a legal document.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) contract.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel