Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

You are building a chatbot that will use question answering in Azure Cognitive Service for Language.You have a PDF named Docl.pdf that contains a product catalogue and a price listYou upload Docl.pdf and train the model.During testing, users report that the chatbot responds correctly to the following question: What is the price of < product>?The chatbot fails to respond to the following question: How much does
B) No
A) Yes

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All AI-102 Questions]

You are building a chatbot that will use question answering in Azure Cognitive Service for Language.

You have a PDF named Docl.pdf that contains a product catalogue and a price list

You upload Docl.pdf and train the model.

During testing, users report that the chatbot responds correctly to the following question: What is the price of < product>?

The chatbot fails to respond to the following question: How much does

You need to ensure that the chatbot responds correctly to both questions.

Solution: From Language Studio, you create an entity for cost, and then retrain and republish the model.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Kaitlyn at Jan 06, 2023, 07:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nidia
7 months ago
Interesting approach, but what if the phrasing changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
7 months ago
Wait, can just adding an entity really fix it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
7 months ago
Definitely agree, that should cover both questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
8 months ago
I think it should work, but I'm not sure about the entity creation part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
8 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
8 months ago
I think creating an entity for cost is definitely part of the solution, but I’m not convinced it’s enough on its own. We might need to look at the overall intent recognition as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
8 months ago
I feel like we might need to do more than just create an entity. In one of the examples, we had to tweak the model's understanding of synonyms and variations in phrasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
8 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to create entities for different product attributes. I think adding an entity for cost is a good step, but I wonder if we need to adjust the training data too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how entities can help improve the understanding of specific terms like cost, but I'm not entirely sure if that alone will fix the issue with the phrasing of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
8 months ago
I think I've got this. The key is to build the hierarchies first, then map the local charts of accounts to the consolidated one. Let me review the steps again to confirm the order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
I'd lean towards RT export and import issues as a likely cause. It aligns with a couple of practice cases we did, but I'm still a bit unsure about intricacies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Restarting the shell makes sense, but I'm not sure if that's the only option. I'll need to review the material and think through the possible solutions before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel