New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 3 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 3
[All AI-102 Questions]

You develop a Conversational Language Undemanding model by using Language Studio

During testing, users receive incorrect responses to requests that do NOT relate to the capabilities of the model.

You need to ensure that the model identifies spurious requests.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Kaitlyn at Jul 10, 2025, 11:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Adria
2 months ago
But wouldn’t active learning be more effective in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 months ago
Totally agree, that should help with spurious requests!
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
3 months ago
I think adding examples to the None intent makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
3 months ago
Adding entities might not address the core issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
3 months ago
Wait, can you really fix incorrect responses just by adding examples?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where adding entities was the answer, but this feels different since we're dealing with incorrect responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
4 months ago
Adding examples to the None intent sounds familiar; it seems like a way to handle unexpected inputs, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
4 months ago
I think enabling active learning could help, but I feel like it might not directly address the spurious requests issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
4 months ago
I remember something about adding examples to intents, but I'm not sure if it should be the custom ones or the None intent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan. I'll start by adding examples to the None intent, and if that doesn't seem to be working, I'll try enabling active learning. That should help the model identify and handle those spurious requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if adding examples to the custom intents or the None intent would be the better approach. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
5 months ago
Adding entities could be a useful strategy, but I'm not sure if that's the most direct way to address the issue described in the question. I might try the None intent approach first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
I think enabling active learning could be a good option here. That way, the model can learn from user feedback and improve its ability to handle spurious requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which approach would be best, but I'm leaning towards adding examples to the None intent. That might help the model better identify requests that don't relate to its capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
7 months ago
Yo, this is the kind of question that's gonna make me question my entire life choices during the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
7 months ago
Adding entities might also be useful in improving the model's accuracy in identifying relevant requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
7 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers are just like, 'Alright, let's just throw all the entities at it and see what sticks!'
upvoted 0 times
Talia
5 months ago
A) Enable active learning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Providencia
7 months ago
I think enabling active learning could also help the model identify spurious requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
7 months ago
I'd go with adding examples to the None intent. That way, the model can recognize when a request doesn't fit any of the known intents.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
5 months ago
User 4: Adding examples to the None intent seems like the best solution to handle incorrect responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
5 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's important for the model to know when a request doesn't match any known intents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
6 months ago
User 2: That makes sense, it would help the model identify spurious requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
7 months ago
User 1: I think adding examples to the None intent is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herman
7 months ago
Adding examples to the custom intents makes sense too. Gotta make sure the model knows what it's supposed to handle.
upvoted 0 times
Rolande
5 months ago
C) Add examples to the None intent
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
B) Add examples to the custom intents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
A) Enable active learning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karl
7 months ago
I agree with Elli, adding examples to custom intents will help the model understand the requests better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
8 months ago
I think we should add examples to the custom intents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
8 months ago
Enabling active learning seems like the way to go. It can help the model identify and learn from those spurious requests.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
7 months ago
C) Add examples to the None intent
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
8 months ago
B) Add examples to the custom intents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
8 months ago
A) Enable active learning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel