Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 4 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 4
[All AI-102 Questions]

You have an Azure Cognitive Search solution and a collection of blog posts that include a category field. You need to index the posts. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* Include the category field in the search results.

* Ensure that users can search for words in the category field.

* Ensure that users can perform drill down filtering based on category.

Which index attributes should you configure for the category field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Elza at Mar 19, 2024, 05:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AI-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Frank
4 months ago
Not sure about A, isn't retrievable enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, it covers all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
4 months ago
Surprised that sortable is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
I think B makes more sense for filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
Option A is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
5 months ago
I believe the right choice is A, since it covers searchable, facetable, and retrievable, which seems to match all the requirements given in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether "sortable" is necessary for the category field. I thought it was more about filtering and searching.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to make fields filterable and retrievable. I feel like "facetable" is also important here for drill down filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
I think the category field needs to be searchable so users can find specific categories, but I'm not sure about the other attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is the correct answer. The requirements clearly state that we need to allow users to search for words in the category field, and that we need to enable drill-down filtering based on category. The "searchable" and "facetable" attributes address those needs, and "retrievable" ensures the category information is included in the search results. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. We need the category field to be searchable, so that users can search for specific words within the category. We also need it to be facetable, so that users can drill down and filter by category. And finally, it needs to be retrievable, so that the category information is included in the search results. I think option A, "searchable, facetable, and retrievable," is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about configuring the index attributes for the category field in an Azure Cognitive Search solution. I think the key requirements are to include the category field in the search results, allow users to search for words in the category field, and enable drill-down filtering based on category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements mention being able to search for words in the category field, so I'm not sure if "retrievable, facetable, and key" would be the right choice, since that doesn't include the "searchable" attribute. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
6 months ago
Option C with Flow seems like a good way to create a custom data entry wizard. That could really streamline the process and save the sales team a lot of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. PoW is energy-intensive, but miners get a reward, while PoS uses less energy but requires a stake. I think I've got the basics, but I'll double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
6 months ago
This looks like it's testing our knowledge of WSDL and service-oriented architecture principles. The examples point to design-time configuration, so I'm leaning towards option A as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 years ago
So the correct index attributes for the category field are searchable, facetable, and retrievable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
Yes, that's why we need to make it facetable as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
2 years ago
But shouldn't we also allow users to perform drill down filtering based on category?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
2 years ago
That makes sense, we need users to be able to search for words in the category field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
I think we should configure the category field as searchable, facetable, and retrievable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
2 years ago
Ha, I bet the exam writers thought they could trick us with those other options. But this one seems pretty straightforward. 'Searchable, facetable, and retrievable' is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
2 years ago
Yeah, that makes sense to me. The other options don't seem to fully address all the requirements. B) wouldn't let users search the category field, and C) and D) are missing key attributes.
upvoted 0 times
Noel
2 years ago
C) retrievable, facetable, and key
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
2 years ago
Exactly, that's why option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
2 years ago
A) searchable, facetable, and retrievable
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
2 years ago
That option would not allow users to search for words in the category field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
2 years ago
B) retrievable, filterable, and sortable
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
2 years ago
Yeah, that covers all the requirements for indexing the category field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
A) searchable, facetable, and retrievable
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
2 years ago
I agree. Based on the options provided, I think the answer is A) searchable, facetable, and retrievable. The 'searchable' attribute allows users to search for words in the category field, 'facetable' enables the drill-down filtering, and 'retrievable' ensures the category field is included in the search results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 years ago
Okay, let's think this through. We need to be able to search for words in the category field, include the category field in the search results, and allow for drill-down filtering based on category. That sounds like a pretty standard set of requirements for an Azure Cognitive Search solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel