New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft AI-102 Exam - Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AI-102 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 2
[All AI-102 Questions]

You have an Azure Cognitive Search instance that indexes purchase orders by using Form Recognizer

You need to analyze the extracted information by using Microsoft Power Bl. The solution must minimize development effort.

What should you add to the indexer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mireya
3 months ago
A file projection? Really? That sounds odd for this scenario!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, C seems like a solid choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
3 months ago
Wait, isn't a table projection more common for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
3 months ago
Definitely agree with that! Projection groups simplify things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that file projections are used for different scenarios, so I don't think that's the answer. It must be one of the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between a projection group and an object projection. I should have reviewed that section more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between different projections. I feel like "a table projection" might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
5 months ago
I remember we discussed projections in class, but I'm not entirely sure which type fits best for Power BI integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, a projection group. That would let us group related fields together, which could make the Power BI integration a bit more seamless. But I'll need to double-check the details to make sure that's the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
Based on the question, it sounds like we want to minimize development effort, so I'm thinking a table projection might be the way to go. That would allow us to easily bring the data into Power BI without having to do a lot of custom mapping or transformations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between a table projection, projection group, object projection, and file projection. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the right approach for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Azure Cognitive Search and Power BI integration. I'll need to think through the different projection options and how they might apply to this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
10 months ago
If this question was any more ambiguous, I'd have to use Azure Face API to find the answer on my own face.
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
9 months ago
C) an object projection
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
9 months ago
B) a projection group
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
A) a table projection
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colette
10 months ago
C) an object projection for sure. It's the one that's like, 'Hey Power BI, here's an object for you to play with!' Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
Mirta
9 months ago
I think C) an object projection is the right choice. It will definitely minimize development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
9 months ago
I agree, C) an object projection is the way to go. It will make the analysis in Power BI much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
9 months ago
Definitely C) an object projection. It's the best option for Power BI integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurena
11 months ago
Oh man, I'm totally lost here. Maybe I should have paid more attention in that Azure Cognitive Search class... D) a file projection sounds like it could be the answer, but who knows?
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) a file projection is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
Actually, an object projection is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
10 months ago
No, I believe a projection group would be more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's B) a projection group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
I believe the correct answer is A) a table projection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
10 months ago
I think it's C) an object projection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
10 months ago
I think you should add a table projection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
11 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking B) a projection group. Isn't that the one that lets you group multiple projections together?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C) an object projection. That's the one that allows you to map the extracted data to a custom object structure in Power BI, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
10 months ago
I think you're right. An object projection is the way to go for analyzing the extracted information in Power BI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
10 months ago
Yes, you are correct. An object projection is what you need to map the extracted data to a custom object structure in Power BI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
11 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think a file projection might be more suitable for analyzing the extracted information in Power BI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
11 months ago
I agree with Vicente. A table projection would be the best option to minimize development effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
11 months ago
I think we should add a table projection to the indexer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel