Ah, I remember this from the Git workshop. When a merge conflict occurs, the affected files are flagged, and the conflict markers are added. The local repository doesn't get updated with the remote changes until you resolve the conflict.
Okay, let me think this through. I know the conflicting files are flagged, and the conflict markers are added to show the differences. I'm pretty sure the files don't get overwritten, so the local changes must remain unchanged.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I know the conflicting files remain unchanged in the local repo, but I can't remember if a new branch is created or if the files are just flagged as conflicting.
I'm pretty confident about this one. When a merge conflict occurs, the conflicting files are flagged, and conflict markers are added to show the differences between the local and remote changes.
B and D, for sure. But you know what would be really helpful? If Git could just magically resolve the conflicts for me. Where's the fun in that, though? *chuckles*
Hah, E is a good one! Wouldn't it be nice if Git just automatically put the newest version in the local repo? That would make my life so much easier. *sigh*
B and D are definitely the correct answers. Git clearly marks the conflicting sections in the files, and the affected files are flagged as conflicting. Easy peasy!
Louvenia
2 months agoDomonique
2 months agoHeidy
2 months agoGail
3 months agoHannah
3 months agoTina
3 months agoSimona
4 months agoFidelia
4 months agoZachary
4 months agoJolanda
4 months agoNan
4 months agoLina
4 months agoLeota
5 months agoMaryln
5 months agoAleisha
5 months agoJody
5 months agoBeula
2 months agoColene
2 months agoWynell
2 months agoMireya
3 months agoElroy
6 months agoVallie
5 months agoLeonie
5 months agoMinna
6 months agoRodolfo
5 months agoMarya
5 months ago