New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

LPI 202-450 Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 202-450 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All 202-450 Questions]

The Samba configuration file contains the following lines:

A workstation is on the wired network with an IP address of 192.168.1.177 but is unable to access the Samba server. A wireless laptop with an IP address 192.168.2.93 can access the Samba server. Additional trouble shooting shows that almost every machine on the wired network is unable to access the Samba server.

Which alternate host allow declaration will permit wired workstations to connect to the Samba server without denying access to anyone else?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Delmy
4 months ago
B is definitely wrong, it’s missing some key IPs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
I think A might work too, but it’s not as specific as E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
4 months ago
Wait, how does E not block anything? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
4 months ago
Totally agree, E covers both subnets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
5 months ago
Looks like option E is the best choice for allowing both wired and wireless access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen a question where the host deny settings were more restrictive. I’m not confident, but I think we want to avoid denying access to the wireless network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
5 months ago
I’m not sure if option E is correct, but it seems like it allows the entire 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 networks, which might work for the wired workstations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
5 months ago
I remember that the host allow directive is used to specify which IP addresses can access the Samba server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
5 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to configure access for different subnets. I wonder if option A could be too broad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
5 months ago
This is a good question. I think the key is understanding how Palo Alto's SASE solution specifically addresses the principles of Zero Trust. Option D seems to be the most relevant, as it talks about continuously validating every stage of a digital interaction, which is a core tenet of Zero Trust. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the purpose of document shredding. I'll need to think carefully about the potential threats it helps prevent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. It mentions using the Hosts file to resolve Managed names, but then asks about DNS entries. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to look for the option that doesn't fit the pattern of the other examples.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to use the loopback interfaces as the BGP router IDs, as specified in the question. I'll go with option A since it seems to match that requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel