Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-683 Topic 2 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-683 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 2
[All JN0-683 Questions]

You are asked to build redundant gateways in your EVPN-VXLAN environment, but you must conserve address space because these gateways must span across seven PES. What should you implement on the PEs lo satisfy these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP):

Juniper Networks' ZTP (Zero Touch Provisioning) process automates the deployment of new devices by allowing them to fetch and execute scripts for configuration and setup as they are powered on and connected to the network.

Supported Scripting Languages:

The Junos OS supports several scripting languages that can be used during the ZTP process:

Shell scripts are often used for general automation tasks.

Python is a widely supported language in Junos, offering powerful scripting capabilities for automating network tasks.

SLAX (Service Logic Execution Environment) is a scripting language specific to Junos, designed to automate configuration tasks and simplify network operations.

Conclusion:

Option D: Correct---Junos ZTP supports Shell, Python, and SLAX, making it the correct choice among the provided options.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Veronika
3 months ago
Come on, guys! This is a classic EVPN-VXLAN question. The answer is clearly C - using the same IP and MAC address on the IRB interfaces. It's the most straightforward and efficient way to conserve address space. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
1 months ago
C) Use IRB interfaces with the same IP and MAC address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 months ago
B) Use IRB interfaces with the same IP and VGA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
2 months ago
A) Use IRB interfaces with the same IP address and different MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeniffer
3 months ago
Option B sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how using the same IP and VGA would work in a multi-PE setup. Wouldn't that create some kind of conflict? I think I'll have to do some more research on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
3 months ago
Haha, this question reminds me of that time I had to configure a VXLAN network with limited IP addresses. I tried using the same IP and MAC on the IRB interfaces, and it was a complete mess! I'd go with option D if I were you.
upvoted 0 times
Julie
1 months ago
It's important to plan carefully to avoid running into the same issues again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
1 months ago
I remember the struggles of configuring a VXLAN network with limited IP addresses as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice to conserve address space while building redundant gateways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
2 months ago
I agree, using the same IP and MAC address on IRB interfaces can cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stevie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't using the same IP and MAC address cause issues with ARP? I'm leaning more towards option A, where we can use the same IP but different MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothea
2 months ago
User 2: Dorothea is right. Option A with different MAC addresses seems like a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
2 months ago
User 1: I think using the same IP and MAC address might cause ARP issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
3 months ago
I think using IRB interfaces with different IP addresses and the same VGA would be the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe using IRB interfaces with the same IP and MAC address would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
3 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Using the same IP and MAC address on the IRB interfaces seems like the most efficient way to conserve address space while providing redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Elroy
2 months ago
User 4: Definitely, it seems like the most efficient solution for spanning across seven PEs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
3 months ago
User 3: It's a smart way to conserve address space while still providing redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
3 months ago
User 2: Agreed, using the same IP and MAC address on the IRB interfaces makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
3 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sonia
3 months ago
I think we should use IRB interfaces with the same IP address and different MAC addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel