U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-481 Exam - Topic 6 Question 13 Discussion

The analytics probe shown in the exhibit is enabled.The ge-0/0/5 interface on the my-esl-001-leaf1 node receives an average of greater than 1 Mbps of traffic. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
A) A probe anomaly will be raised. and B) The indicator for the Analytics tab in the blueprint will turn red.
C) The indicator for the Active tab in the blueprint will turn red.
D) A service anomaly will be raised.

Juniper JN0-481 Exam - Topic 6 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-481 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-481 Questions]

The analytics probe shown in the exhibit is enabled.

The ge-0/0/5 interface on the my-esl-001-leaf1 node receives an average of greater than 1 Mbps of traffic. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

In Apstra 5.1, an IBA probe is a defined analytics pipeline that applies to a scoped set of graph objects (here, interfaces) and evaluates telemetry against logic defined in its processors. The exhibit shows a probe that consumes Interface Counters Average and then applies a Range processor. In the processor configuration, the Anomalous Range is set to ''greater than 1,000,000'' (bytes per second--equivalent for ~1 Mbps depending on the probe's metric definition), and Raise Anomaly is set to True. Therefore, when ge-0/0/5 receives an average traffic level above the configured threshold, the probe's condition evaluates as anomalous and Apstra raises a probe anomaly for that interface. That makes statement A correct.

When probe anomalies are raised, Apstra surfaces them in the blueprint's Analytics area because they are analytics-derived findings (as opposed to configuration drift or deployment workflow issues). As a result, the blueprint's Analytics tab indicator changes state (commonly to red with a badge count) to signal active analytics anomalies requiring attention. That makes statement B correct.

This event is not classified as a service anomaly (which is associated with higher-level service intent/assurance objects) unless separately mapped by policy/logic, and it does not primarily drive the Active tab indicator, which is focused on operational state views rather than being the primary alert surface for IBA probe anomalies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel