Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-481 Exam - Topic 6 Question 13 Discussion

The analytics probe shown in the exhibit is enabled.The ge-0/0/5 interface on the my-esl-001-leaf1 node receives an average of greater than 1 Mbps of traffic. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
A) A probe anomaly will be raised. and B) The indicator for the Analytics tab in the blueprint will turn red.
C) The indicator for the Active tab in the blueprint will turn red.
D) A service anomaly will be raised.

Juniper JN0-481 Exam - Topic 6 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-481 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-481 Questions]

The analytics probe shown in the exhibit is enabled.

The ge-0/0/5 interface on the my-esl-001-leaf1 node receives an average of greater than 1 Mbps of traffic. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

In Apstra 5.1, an IBA probe is a defined analytics pipeline that applies to a scoped set of graph objects (here, interfaces) and evaluates telemetry against logic defined in its processors. The exhibit shows a probe that consumes Interface Counters Average and then applies a Range processor. In the processor configuration, the Anomalous Range is set to ''greater than 1,000,000'' (bytes per second--equivalent for ~1 Mbps depending on the probe's metric definition), and Raise Anomaly is set to True. Therefore, when ge-0/0/5 receives an average traffic level above the configured threshold, the probe's condition evaluates as anomalous and Apstra raises a probe anomaly for that interface. That makes statement A correct.

When probe anomalies are raised, Apstra surfaces them in the blueprint's Analytics area because they are analytics-derived findings (as opposed to configuration drift or deployment workflow issues). As a result, the blueprint's Analytics tab indicator changes state (commonly to red with a badge count) to signal active analytics anomalies requiring attention. That makes statement B correct.

This event is not classified as a service anomaly (which is associated with higher-level service intent/assurance objects) unless separately mapped by policy/logic, and it does not primarily drive the Active tab indicator, which is focused on operational state views rather than being the primary alert surface for IBA probe anomalies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Dorthy
3 days ago
I heard the traffic threshold is a big deal for these probes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
8 days ago
No way, the Active tab should turn red instead!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
13 days ago
Wait, are we sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
18 days ago
I think the Analytics tab will turn red too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
24 days ago
A probe anomaly will definitely be raised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
29 days ago
I’m leaning towards option A and B being correct, but I’m a bit uncertain about the specifics of the indicators in the blueprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like a service anomaly might be related to the traffic levels too, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
1 month ago
I think the Analytics tab turning red is definitely a possibility, especially if the traffic is consistently high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 month ago
I remember something about probes raising anomalies, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for traffic over 1 Mbps.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel