New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper JN0-363 Exam - Topic 4 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-363 Questions]

You want to share routes between two routing instances that you have configured?

What are two ways to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.

To share routes between two routing instances on a Junos device, you can configure an instance import policy in one or both instances to import routes from the other instance. Alternatively, a RIB (Routing Information Base) group can be used to share routes between instances. Reference::

Routing Instances Overview, Juniper Networks Documentation

RIB Groups Configuration Guide, Juniper Networks Documentation


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leonie
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree with the RIB group option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
2 months ago
Wait, can you really use a non-forwarding instance? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
3 months ago
I’m not sure about that. Isn’t a forwarding instance more common?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
I think instance import policy is the way to go too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
3 months ago
You can definitely use a RIB group for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
3 months ago
I think RIB groups were mentioned in a similar question, but I’m not confident if they’re the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
4 months ago
I feel like creating a forwarding instance could be related, but I can't recall if it actually helps with sharing routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
4 months ago
I remember practicing with instance import policies; that seems like a solid choice for sharing routes between instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
4 months ago
I think using a non-forwarding instance might be one way to share routes, but I'm not completely sure about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think options B and D are the correct answers, but I'm not 100% certain. I'll need to double-check my understanding of routing instances and how to share routes between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
4 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The two ways to share routes are to configure an instance import policy (option B) and use a RIB group (option D). I'm confident I can explain those approaches in the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between a forwarding and non-forwarding instance. I'll need to review that concept before attempting this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think the key is to understand the difference between forwarding and non-forwarding instances, and how instance import policies and RIB groups can be used to share routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
8 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it's A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
8 months ago
Aha! I know this one. B and D are the correct answers. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the way to go. Now, if only I could remember what a RIB group actually is...
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
8 months ago
I agree with Leota. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group should work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chu
8 months ago
I'm going with B and D too. Although, I have to admit, a non-forwarding instance sounds like something you'd use to avoid paying your internet bill. Just a little routing humor there!
upvoted 0 times
Suzi
8 months ago
Haha, that's a good one! Non-forwarding instance does sound like a sneaky way to avoid bills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
8 months ago
I'm going with B and D too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
8 months ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
8 months ago
B and D sound right to me. Using a non-forwarding instance doesn't make much sense, and I'm pretty sure a forwarding instance is for something else. Time to brush up on my routing instance knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't a forwarding instance be a better option? Maybe I'm just confused, but I feel like that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lizette
8 months ago
D) Use a RIB group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
C) Create a forwarding instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
8 months ago
B) Configure an instance import policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
8 months ago
A) Use a non-forwarding instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nieves
9 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. Configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the two ways to share routes between routing instances.
upvoted 0 times
Charlette
8 months ago
That's correct. Those are the two methods to accomplish the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
8 months ago
Yes, configuring an instance import policy and using a RIB group are the ways to share routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
8 months ago
I believe the correct answers are B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel