New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-351 Exam - Topic 6 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-351 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 6
[All JN0-351 Questions]

Exhibit.

The ispi _ inet. 0 route table has currently no routes in it.

What will happen when you commit the configuration shown on the exhibit?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Bis correct because the loops do not exist is one of the conditions that are verified by the receiving router to ensure that the received BGP route is valid.A loop in BGP means that a route has been advertised by the same AS more than once, which can cause routing instability and inefficiency1.To prevent loops, BGP uses the AS-path attribute, which lists the AS numbers that a route has traversed from the origin to the destination2.The receiving router checks the AS-path attribute of the received route and discards it if it finds its own AS number in the list2. This way, BGP avoids accepting routes that contain loops.

Cis correct because the next hop is reachable is one of the conditions that are verified by the receiving router to ensure that the received BGP route is valid.The next hop is the IP address of the next router that is used to forward packets to the destination network3.The receiving router checks the next hop attribute of the received route and verifies that it has a valid route to reach it3.If the next hop is not reachable, the received route is not usable and is rejected by the receiving router3. This way, BGP ensures that only feasible routes are accepted.


by Candida at Mar 09, 2024, 02:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-351 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Terrilyn
3 months ago
Surprised there’s no routes in the ispi table at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
3 months ago
I think it’s B, importing makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
3 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it would import instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
Totally agree, A is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
4 months ago
A ispi . inet. 0 route table has no routes, so it’ll be overwritten.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
4 months ago
I keep mixing up the import and overwrite concepts; I hope I chose the right one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
4 months ago
I feel like the ISPI . inet. 0 route table should import routes into inet. 0, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where the route tables were merged, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
5 months ago
I think the inet. 0 route table will be overwritten by the ispi . inet. 0 route table, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think I need to review my understanding of route tables and how they interact before I can confidently answer the question. I'll make sure to read through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. If the ispi.inet.0 route table is empty, then committing the configuration should just overwrite the inet.0 route table with the ispi.inet.0 table, which is also empty. So I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. What's the difference between the ispi.inet.0 and inet.0 route tables? I'll need to make sure I understand that before I can answer the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question says the ispi_inet.0 route table has no routes, so I'm guessing that means the inet.0 route table is the one with the actual routes. I'll have to think about how the configuration change might affect that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and the exhibit to understand what's happening with the route tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know send logging is important, but I'm not entirely clear on the specific requirements. I'll need to think through the options and see if I can eliminate any of the choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
5 months ago
I vaguely remember we discussed something about migrating from ECS-based databases too. Was that in the scope?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
I've got a feeling this question is trying to 'ispi' me up. But I'm not falling for it! B is the way to go. The inet. 0 route table will be imported into the ispi . inet. 0 route table. Boom, nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
Loise
9 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
10 months ago
Good job! You nailed it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
The answer is B) The inet. 0 route table will be imported into the ispi . inet. 0 route table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Altha
10 months ago
Ah, the classic 'import' vs 'overwrite' dilemma. I'm going with B. The inet. 0 route table will be imported into the ispi . inet. 0 route table. It's like a digital game of musical chairs, but with route tables!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
10 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards D, but I'm not 100% confident. The ISPI . inet. 0 route table will be imported into the inet. 0 route table. Seems logical, but I could be missing something. Time to double-check my notes!
upvoted 0 times
Page
8 months ago
Definitely, better safe than sorry. It's always good to review and make sure you're making the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
8 months ago
Yeah, it's always better to be safe than sorry when it comes to configurations like this. Double-checking is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
8 months ago
I agree, D seems like the most logical choice here. But it's always good to double-check your notes just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
8 months ago
I think you're on the right track with D. It does seem logical that the ISPI . inet. 0 route table will be imported into the inet. 0 route table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lemuel
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing. I'm going to go with C just to be safe. The ISPI . inet. 0 route table will be completely overwritten by the inet. o route table. Wait, did I misread that last option? Oops, my bad!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
10 months ago
Since the question states that the ispi . inet. 0 route table has no routes, I'm pretty sure the correct answer is B. The inet. 0 route table will be imported into the ispi . inet. 0 route table. Seems straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
10 months ago
Yeah, importing the routes into the ispi . inet. 0 route table makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenise
10 months ago
Why do you think it's D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel