Haha, underlay routing with BGP? That's like driving a Ferrari on gravel roads. But if you must, then B and C are the way to go. Gotta get that load-balancing and control plane scalability dialed in, am I right?
Hmm, I think A and D are the right answers. You gotta have those static routes for the EBGP peerings, and an IGP is usually a must-have. B and C are just too advanced for the underlay, in my opinion.
B is the key here. EBGP underlay needs that multipath multiple-as parameter to handle the load-balancing. C is also spot on - Route Reflection is super useful for the control plane in this scenario.
A and C are definitely correct. BGP is a great choice for the underlay, and Route Reflection can help with scalability. But D seems a bit off - I've seen EBGP underlays work just fine without an IGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Halina
7 days agoCarla
19 days agoGilma
3 days agoDemetra
22 days agoFausto
27 days agoGolda
28 days agoMadalyn
2 days agoZoila
1 months agoPhung
23 hours agoPrecious
7 days agoIvory
1 months ago