New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper JN0-1103 Exam - Topic 3 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-1103 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-1103 Questions]

Which two statements are correct about using BGP as the underlay routing protocol in an IP fabric? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Deja at Apr 30, 2025, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-1103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Charlene
2 months ago
C is the way to go for IBGP, totally agree!
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
2 months ago
Wait, D says IGP is required? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
2 months ago
B sounds right, multipath is key for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I disagree, A is not true. No static routes needed for EBGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
3 months ago
C is definitely correct, helps with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
3 months ago
I remember that using an IGP isn't mandatory for EBGP underlay, so I think option D is definitely incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
3 months ago
I’m uncertain about the multipath multiple-as parameter; it sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it's specifically required for EBGP underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question about route reflection and IBGP scalability before, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
4 months ago
I think I remember that static routes aren't necessary for EBGP neighbors to establish, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I've worked with BGP in IP fabrics before, so I think I can apply that knowledge to identify the correct statements. Time to put on my thinking cap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
I remember learning about BGP in the underlay, but I'm not sure I fully understand the requirements for EBGP versus IBGP. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I get this right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know BGP can be used as the underlay routing protocol, and I think Route Reflection is related to IBGP scalability. I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between EBGP and IBGP in an IP fabric. I'll need to think through the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm confident I can figure out the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
9 months ago
I think option D is incorrect because using an IGP is not required for an EBGP underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
9 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. Do we really need static routes for EBGP neighbors?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
9 months ago
Haha, underlay routing with BGP? That's like driving a Ferrari on gravel roads. But if you must, then B and C are the way to go. Gotta get that load-balancing and control plane scalability dialed in, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Deeann
8 months ago
Agreed, it's all about finding the right balance for your network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
9 months ago
Definitely, those features are key for optimizing performance and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
9 months ago
Yeah, BGP underlay can be tricky, but multipath and route reflection can really help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Demetra
10 months ago
I agree with you, Fausto. I also think option B is correct because multipath can improve load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
10 months ago
I think option C is correct because Route Reflection can help with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
10 months ago
Hmm, I think A and D are the right answers. You gotta have those static routes for the EBGP peerings, and an IGP is usually a must-have. B and C are just too advanced for the underlay, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Lyndia
8 months ago
B and C might be too advanced for the underlay, as you mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
9 months ago
Static routes are indeed required for EBGP neighbors to establish, and using an IGP is necessary for an EBGP underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
9 months ago
I agree, A and D are the correct choices for using BGP as the underlay routing protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
10 months ago
B is the key here. EBGP underlay needs that multipath multiple-as parameter to handle the load-balancing. C is also spot on - Route Reflection is super useful for the control plane in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Broderick
9 months ago
Using an IGP is not required for an EBGP underlay, so D is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
9 months ago
Route Reflection is a great tool for control plane scalability in an IBGP underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
9 months ago
B is definitely important for load-balancing in EBGP underlay.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivory
10 months ago
A and C are definitely correct. BGP is a great choice for the underlay, and Route Reflection can help with scalability. But D seems a bit off - I've seen EBGP underlays work just fine without an IGP.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel