New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB CTFL-Foundation Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTFL-Foundation exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All CTFL-Foundation Questions]

Which of the following is a defect that is more likely to be found by a static analysis tool than by other testing techniques?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Rolland at Jan 27, 2024, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTFL-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elmira
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? Seems like it could slip through other tests too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
3 months ago
I agree with C, memory leaks are tricky without static checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
4 months ago
A major requirement omission? That's a big deal, but I doubt static tools catch that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
4 months ago
I think D is more likely, unused variables are easy to catch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
4 months ago
Definitely C, static analysis is great for memory issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
4 months ago
I remember that static analysis can help with code quality issues, but I'm confused about decision coverage. I think B might be more about dynamic testing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like omissions in requirements are usually found through reviews, not static analysis. So maybe A is less likely?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about memory leaks being harder to find with just static analysis. Could it be C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
5 months ago
I think static analysis tools are good at catching things like unused variables, so maybe D is the right answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. I know static analysis is good for finding certain types of coding errors, but I'm not sure which specific defects it's better at detecting compared to other techniques. Guess I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Static analysis tools are great at finding issues like unused variables and memory leaks that might be harder to catch through other testing. I'm pretty confident I can nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the differences between static analysis and other testing methods. I'll have to review my notes on that before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
This looks like a question about the strengths of static analysis tools compared to other testing techniques. I'll need to think carefully about the types of defects that are more likely to be found by static analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. If the Commserver and Agent are on the same network, I don't think I'd need to configure the hosts file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The PE-B SAP is more specific, so it will only match one of the two tags. The answer is 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel