MENU
Consider the code fragment provided below:
The comment frequency of the code fragment is 13%.
To which non-functional quality characteristic does a good level of comment frequency especially contribute?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CTAL-TTA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Static analysis is the best technique for identifying the root causes of issues in a legacy system where small functional enhancements take disproportionately long to implement. This technique involves examining the code without executing it to detect potential vulnerabilities, coding errors, and complexities. Static analysis can highlight problematic code segments and inefficient coding practices that may contribute to the increased time required for implementing changes, thereby assisting in addressing these systemic issues efficiently.
38 comments · newest first
FE
Fernanda
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure comments really affect performance efficiency?
DE
Delsie
11 months ago
I agree with B, comments help a lot when revisiting code.
EL
Eleonora
11 months ago
13% comment frequency? That's kinda low, isn't it?
IL
Ilene
11 months ago
I think it might be A, portability sounds right too.
MA
Maryrose
11 months ago
Definitely B, maintainability is key!
MO
Mona
12 months ago
I agree with maintainability, but I wonder if there are cases where comments could impact performance efficiency too.
MA
Marnie
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused. I thought comments might also relate to usability, but maintainability seems more relevant based on what we studied.
FL
Flo
12 months ago
I think maintainability is definitely the right choice. We practiced a similar question where comments improved code readability.
MI
Michell
1 year ago
I remember that a higher comment frequency usually helps with maintainability, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best answer here.
RI
Ria
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. Since the question is asking about non-functional quality characteristics, I'll focus on things like maintainability, portability, and usability. The comment frequency seems like it could be most relevant to maintainability, but I'll double-check the definitions to be sure.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The comment frequency is given, but I'm not sure how that directly relates to the different quality characteristics. I'll need to think through the implications of good code commenting more carefully.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the relationship between code comments and software quality characteristics. I'll carefully review the code fragment and the provided information to determine which non-functional quality characteristic is most relevant.
GE
German
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not super confident in my knowledge of the different software quality characteristics and how they're impacted by things like comment frequency. I'll need to make an educated guess here and hope for the best.
MA
Malinda
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options don't seem to align perfectly with the task described. I'm not sure if creating a new environment or using Easy Installer is the right approach here. Maybe I should try to think through the vRSLCM workflow and see if I can identify the most logical next step.
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about making the web app available for client computers to access. That sounds like it's talking about deployment, so I'm going with A - Deploying.
FR
Fredric
1 year ago
MoReq2010 sounds familiar, but I can't quite recall how it connects to legal holds. I hope it's not a trick question!
AL
Alfred
1 year ago
Portability? Yeah, right. This code is about as portable as a lead balloon.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
Usability, definitely. I can already imagine the users scratching their heads, wondering if the developers were fluent in any language.
DE
Delisa
1 year ago
D) Performance Efficiency
PA
Patria
1 year ago
C) Usability
RA
Rachael
1 year ago
B) Maintainability
JA
Jarvis
1 year ago
A) Portability
GE
Georgiana
1 year ago
Performance Efficiency? More like Perplexity Efficiency. Who needs speed when you can have confusion?
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
D) Performance Efficiency
TA
Tambra
1 year ago
C) Usability
DA
Daron
1 year ago
B) Maintainability
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
A) Portability
LE
Lennie
1 year ago
Maintainability, of course! With that level of commenting, the code might as well be written in hieroglyphics.
DE
Devon
1 year ago
D) Performance Efficiency
KA
Kattie
1 year ago
C) Usability
HA
Hassie
1 year ago
B) Maintainability
IS
Isadora
1 year ago
A) Portability
VA
Valda
1 year ago
Hmm, 13% comment frequency? That's like having a conversation with yourself and only 13% of it makes any sense.
PE
Pete
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, having good comments definitely helps with maintaining the code.
LE
Leontine
1 year ago
User 1: B) Maintainability
TA
Tarra
1 year ago
I believe it could also contribute to Usability, as clear comments make the code more user-friendly.
JA
Janet
2 years ago
I agree with Alaine, comments help in understanding and maintaining the code.
AL
Alaine
2 years ago
I think a good level of comment frequency contributes to Maintainability.