New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB CT-TAE Exam - Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All CT-TAE Questions]

You have been asked to determine a TAS for a new release of a SUT, test should be automated wherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.

What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shawnta
12 hours ago
Totally agree, we need those customized hooks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
6 days ago
I think option C makes the most sense for thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 days ago
I wonder if the developers will remember to update those "customized hooks" when the real interfaces are ready...
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
16 days ago
Option D is a bit too narrow, we should automate at both levels to ensure thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
21 days ago
Option B is too limited, we need to test at both the component and system level for a robust TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
26 days ago
I like how Option C suggests using customized hooks at the component level to handle interfaces not yet developed or amended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 month ago
I remember something about focusing on the newly developed interfaces, but I’m not clear if just doing System level automation is enough for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
1 month ago
I feel like option C makes sense because it allows for flexibility with the new interfaces, but I'm uncertain if we should really automate at both levels right away.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 month ago
I think we practiced a similar question where automating at both levels was beneficial, but I can't recall if we should create hooks for interfaces that aren't ready yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B. Automating at just the system level and using the new interfaces as-is seems like the simplest and most straightforward approach. We can always add more automation later if we need to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
2 months ago
I like the idea of option C. Automating at both levels and using customized hooks for the unfinished interfaces will let us get a head start on the automation work. That way, we can hit the ground running once the interfaces are complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
2 months ago
Option A sounds like the safest bet to me. Waiting until the interfaces are fully developed and manually tested before automating just seems like the low-risk approach. I don't want to get stuck trying to automate something that's still in flux.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I think option C is the best. It covers both levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of incremental testing, but I'm not sure if we should wait until everything is fully developed before automating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
Option C seems the most comprehensive approach to handle the incremental release of the new and amended interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
Not sure about waiting until everything's done, that's risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. It seems like we have to decide on the test automation strategy before the interfaces are fully developed. Wouldn't it be better to wait until the interfaces are complete before starting the automation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
3 months ago
I think option C is the best approach here. Automating at both the component and system level will give us the most comprehensive coverage, and using customized hooks for the interfaces that aren't fully developed yet is a smart way to get started on automation early.
upvoted 0 times
Brittani
3 months ago
I like how it allows testing as interfaces are developed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel