MENU
Your company is new to test automation and as TAE. you have designed a TAS which successfully supports the SUT for the current project.
There are other systems currently in operation which have been tested manually and more systems are planned over the coming years. Based on this success, your company requires test automation be rolled out to other current and future SUTs with consistency being a key objective.
Which of the following is the BEST way to achieve that?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CT-TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
NI
Nieves
10 months ago
Option D could be useful too, but we need a solid foundation first.
BR
Brittni
11 months ago
Wait, can one TAS really handle all those different SUTs? Sounds risky.
RO
Rosalia
11 months ago
Not sure about that, managing multiple TAS could be easier for some teams.
SA
Sabrina
11 months ago
Totally agree, centralizing the TAS is the way to go!
BE
Bettina
11 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for consistency.
VI
Vivienne
12 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, but I wonder if just tracking failures is enough to ensure consistency across all SUTs.
RU
Rutha
12 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where centralizing the TAS was emphasized, so option B seems to align with that approach.
DA
Darrel
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like designing a new TAS for each SUT could lead to more confusion and inconsistency.
SH
Shawnna
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of consistency in test automation, so I think option B might be the best choice.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Checking for correct connectivity seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's the "BEST" way to achieve consistency. Maybe the answer has something to do with managing the test automation framework itself, rather than just the individual deployments.
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The best way to achieve consistency is to develop a reusable, modular test automation framework that can be easily deployed and configured for each SUT. That way, we can maintain a single codebase and ensure consistency across all our systems.
KA
Karrie
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if installing the current TAS into a central repository is the best approach, as that might not address the need for consistency across different SUTs. I'll have to think this through carefully.
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about achieving consistency in test automation across different systems. I think the key is to find a way to centralize and manage the test automation framework, rather than having a separate one for each system.
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to double-check the details on the different deployment methods and how they handle the client IP addresses.
EM
Emeline
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different sources the firewall might use to determine the botnet infection likelihood.
JE
Jeniffer
1 year ago
Hey, I heard they're planning to have a TAS dance-off to decide the best approach. I'm already practicing my moves!
IN
India
1 year ago
D) Develop a tool that keeps track of automation failures across the different SUTs and produces regular reports to stakeholders.
BU
Buck
1 year ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
CO
Corrie
1 year ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
WI
Wilford
1 year ago
A tool to track automation failures? Brilliant! It's like having a personal assistant to keep an eye on things for us.
VI
Viki
1 year ago
User 3: Developing a tool to track automation failures would definitely help us stay on top of things.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that way we can ensure consistency across different SUTs.
AD
Adolph
1 year ago
User 1: Installing the current TAS into a central repository sounds like a good idea.
EL
Eleonore
1 year ago
Checking connectivity to internal and external systems? Sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure it'll achieve the consistency we're looking for.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
KI
Kina
1 year ago
D) Develop a tool that keeps track of automation failures across the different SUTs and produces regular reports to stakeholders.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
DO
Dottie
1 year ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
CA
Carlene
1 year ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
DO
Douglass
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have a dedicated automation support team for each SUT, like option A suggests?
VA
Valentin
2 years ago
I agree with Evangelina. Installing the current TAS into a central repository will ensure all tests use the same version.
EM
Emile
2 years ago
Ah, a central repository for the TAS. Now that's what I call efficiency! It's like having a one-stop shop for all your automation needs.
DO
Dominic
1 year ago
User 4: It would also save time and effort in managing multiple TAS for different systems.
SY
Sylvia
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, having a one-stop shop for automation needs would make things much easier.
PE
Pearlene
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it would definitely help with consistency across different SUTs.
VO
Von
1 year ago
User 1: Installing the TAS into a central repository sounds like a great idea.
EV
Evangelina
2 years ago
I think option B is the best way to achieve consistency in test automation.
LI
Lisbeth
2 years ago
Designing a new TAS for each SUT? That's like building a new house for every family member. Way too much work if you ask me.