Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB CT-TAE Exam - Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CT-TAE exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All CT-TAE Questions]

Your company is new to test automation and as TAE. you have designed a TAS which successfully supports the SUT for the current project.

There are other systems currently in operation which have been tested manually and more systems are planned over the coming years. Based on this success, your company requires test automation be rolled out to other current and future SUTs with consistency being a key objective.

Which of the following is the BEST way to achieve that?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jin at Jul 04, 2024, 09:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CT-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nieves
6 months ago
Option D could be useful too, but we need a solid foundation first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
6 months ago
Wait, can one TAS really handle all those different SUTs? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
6 months ago
Not sure about that, managing multiple TAS could be easier for some teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
7 months ago
Totally agree, centralizing the TAS is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
7 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
7 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, but I wonder if just tracking failures is enough to ensure consistency across all SUTs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
7 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where centralizing the TAS was emphasized, so option B seems to align with that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like designing a new TAS for each SUT could lead to more confusion and inconsistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
8 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of consistency in test automation, so I think option B might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Checking for correct connectivity seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure if that's the "BEST" way to achieve consistency. Maybe the answer has something to do with managing the test automation framework itself, rather than just the individual deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The best way to achieve consistency is to develop a reusable, modular test automation framework that can be easily deployed and configured for each SUT. That way, we can maintain a single codebase and ensure consistency across all our systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if installing the current TAS into a central repository is the best approach, as that might not address the need for consistency across different SUTs. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about achieving consistency in test automation across different systems. I think the key is to find a way to centralize and manage the test automation framework, rather than having a separate one for each system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to double-check the details on the different deployment methods and how they handle the client IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different sources the firewall might use to determine the botnet infection likelihood.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
1 year ago
Hey, I heard they're planning to have a TAS dance-off to decide the best approach. I'm already practicing my moves!
upvoted 0 times
India
11 months ago
D) Develop a tool that keeps track of automation failures across the different SUTs and produces regular reports to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
11 months ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
12 months ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilford
1 year ago
A tool to track automation failures? Brilliant! It's like having a personal assistant to keep an eye on things for us.
upvoted 0 times
Viki
11 months ago
User 3: Developing a tool to track automation failures would definitely help us stay on top of things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that way we can ensure consistency across different SUTs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
12 months ago
User 1: Installing the current TAS into a central repository sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonore
1 year ago
Checking connectivity to internal and external systems? Sounds like a good idea, but I'm not sure it'll achieve the consistency we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
1 year ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kina
1 year ago
D) Develop a tool that keeps track of automation failures across the different SUTs and produces regular reports to stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
B) Install the current TAS into a central repository so that other tests on different SUTs use the same version of the TAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 year ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
1 year ago
A) Design a new TAS for each SUT, and manage each one through a dedicated automation support team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Douglass
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have a dedicated automation support team for each SUT, like option A suggests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 year ago
I agree with Evangelina. Installing the current TAS into a central repository will ensure all tests use the same version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
1 year ago
Ah, a central repository for the TAS. Now that's what I call efficiency! It's like having a one-stop shop for all your automation needs.
upvoted 0 times
Dominic
12 months ago
User 4: It would also save time and effort in managing multiple TAS for different systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, having a one-stop shop for automation needs would make things much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it would definitely help with consistency across different SUTs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
User 1: Installing the TAS into a central repository sounds like a great idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
I think option B is the best way to achieve consistency in test automation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 year ago
Designing a new TAS for each SUT? That's like building a new house for every family member. Way too much work if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel