I recall a practice question that mentioned the challenges of automating tests for features that aren't fully developed yet, so option D could be relevant too.
D seems a bit off to me. Just because a new feature is being introduced doesn't mean it's more difficult to automate test cases for it. The automation engineer should be able to work with the developers to identify the right test cases, regardless of whether the feature is new or not.
I think the key here is that the SUT already has an existing automated test suite. That means the tests are already in place, so A is definitely not correct. I'm leaning towards B or C as the best options.
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. The introduction of a new feature would likely require updates or additions to the existing test suite to ensure it covers the new functionality.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I can see the logic behind B, but I'm also wondering if C might be the right answer. The test automation engineer should definitely work with the business analysts to make sure the new feature is testable.
Alright, I think I've got this. Based on the requirements, the "Sales Agreement Metrics" seems like the best option to handle the long-term agreement tracking. And the "Advanced Account Forecast Fact" object can probably handle the custom fiscal year and weekly forecast metrics they need. Feels like a solid approach to me.
I've seen "client" and "standalone" used before, so those are my top picks. The other options seem a bit less common, so I'll have to double-check those.
Option A? Are you kidding me? Automated tests not affected by new features? That's like saying the Titanic wasn't affected by icebergs. Good luck with that one, folks!
Option A? Are you kidding me? Automated tests not affected by new features? That's like saying the Titanic wasn't affected by icebergs. Good luck with that one, folks!
I'm going to have to disagree with option A. Automated tests are definitely not unaffected by new features. That's like saying I can just keep using the same old screwdriver to build a rocket ship. Not gonna work, my friend.
Option D is just too obvious, isn't it? Of course it's more difficult to automate test cases for a new feature - the development hasn't even started yet! Talk about a loaded question.
I'm going to have to go with option C. The test automation engineer should definitely work with the business analysts to ensure the new feature is testable. Otherwise, how are we supposed to automate those tests effectively?
Hmm, option B seems to be the correct answer. The introduction of a new feature would definitely require updates or additions to the existing test suite. I can't imagine just running the old tests against a new feature - that would be a recipe for disaster!
Quentin
3 months agoTesha
3 months agoViola
3 months agoThora
4 months agoTomas
4 months agoBroderick
4 months agoLaurel
4 months agoRemona
4 months agoNoel
5 months agoLonna
5 months agoLucina
5 months agoJosefa
5 months agoTonja
5 months agoKris
5 months agoEttie
5 months agoVicki
5 months agoShakira
10 months agoAnglea
8 months agoWillie
8 months agoDorthy
9 months agoDeandrea
10 months agoGracia
9 months agoRyan
9 months agoTiera
9 months agoLeonor
10 months agoStephen
8 months agoEstrella
8 months agoFrance
10 months agoEdwin
10 months agoClorinda
9 months agoAileen
10 months agoShannon
10 months agoCarin
11 months agoClorinda
11 months agoBeatriz
11 months ago