Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

During code reviews, it is the author's responsibility... 1 credit [K2]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lindsey at Dec 24, 2023, 04:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tawny
2 days ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
6 days ago
C) Addressing only improvement suggestions? That's a bit too lax, don't you think? As an author, I'd want to fix all the issues, not just the ones I feel like.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
6 days ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
9 days ago
I believe the author should also take action on improvement suggestions to continuously improve the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
10 days ago
A) seems like the most comprehensive answer, addressing all defects regardless of their severity. That's what I would expect from a responsible author during code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
11 days ago
I agree with Francene. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
17 days ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel