New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATTA Exam - Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

During code reviews, it is the author's responsibility... 1 credit [K2]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lindsey at Dec 24, 2023, 04:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Michal
3 months ago
Yeah, I thought we only needed to focus on the major defects!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
I believe it's more about addressing the major ones, not all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
3 months ago
Wait, are we really expected to fix every single defect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
4 months ago
Totally agree, fixing all defects is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
4 months ago
I think it's definitely the author's job to address defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
4 months ago
I feel like the author should at least correct major defects, but I can't recall if that was the focus of our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether "take action" means just suggestions or if it includes defects too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we discussed the difference between addressing and fixing defects. I feel like addressing might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
5 months ago
I think the author is responsible for addressing defects, but I'm not sure if that means fixing everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
5 months ago
This is a good one. I think the answer is B - the author's responsibility is to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log. That seems to be the most comprehensive and accurate description of the author's role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The options seem to be focused on different aspects of the defect log, but I'm not sure how that relates to the author's responsibility. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is asking about the author's responsibility, but the options seem to be focused on the defect log. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the responsibilities of a code reviewer. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes the author's responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the author's responsibility, not just the defect log. I'm leaning towards option A, which seems to capture the idea of addressing all major and minor defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
I've heard of continuous integration before, but I'm a little fuzzy on the details. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the concept fully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
5 months ago
Okay, I've done some autofs configuration before, so I think I've got a good handle on the general approach. The key will be making sure I get the paths and options correct for this specific setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
10 months ago
Ah, the joys of code reviews. Where the author gets to play 'spot the difference' with the defect log. Fun times!
upvoted 0 times
Aimee
8 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
8 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
8 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
10 months ago
I've got a defect for ya - the person who wrote this question needs to review their own code review policies!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
9 months ago
D) to correct source documents that have major defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walker
10 months ago
D) Correcting source documents with major defects? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. The author should be tackling the code itself, not the paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
10 months ago
I disagree. I believe the author should only take action on improvement suggestions from the defect log to prioritize tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
10 months ago
I agree with Tawny. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
10 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
11 months ago
C) Addressing only improvement suggestions? That's a bit too lax, don't you think? As an author, I'd want to fix all the issues, not just the ones I feel like.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
9 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
9 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
9 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
10 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
11 months ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
Beula
9 months ago
D) to correct source documents that have major defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
9 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
10 months ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
10 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
11 months ago
I believe the author should also take action on improvement suggestions to continuously improve the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
11 months ago
A) seems like the most comprehensive answer, addressing all defects regardless of their severity. That's what I would expect from a responsible author during code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
11 months ago
I agree with Francene. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
11 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel