Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

During code reviews, it is the author's responsibility... 1 credit [K2]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lindsey at Dec 24, 2023, 04:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Whitley
3 months ago
Ah, the joys of code reviews. Where the author gets to play 'spot the difference' with the defect log. Fun times!
upvoted 0 times
Aimee
1 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
1 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
3 months ago
I've got a defect for ya - the person who wrote this question needs to review their own code review policies!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
2 months ago
D) to correct source documents that have major defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walker
3 months ago
D) Correcting source documents with major defects? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. The author should be tackling the code itself, not the paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
3 months ago
I disagree. I believe the author should only take action on improvement suggestions from the defect log to prioritize tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
3 months ago
I agree with Tawny. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
3 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
3 months ago
C) Addressing only improvement suggestions? That's a bit too lax, don't you think? As an author, I'd want to fix all the issues, not just the ones I feel like.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
2 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
2 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
2 months ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
3 months ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
Beula
2 months ago
D) to correct source documents that have major defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 months ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
2 months ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
3 months ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
3 months ago
I believe the author should also take action on improvement suggestions to continuously improve the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
3 months ago
A) seems like the most comprehensive answer, addressing all defects regardless of their severity. That's what I would expect from a responsible author during code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
3 months ago
I agree with Francene. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
4 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel