Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All ATTA Questions]

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

During code reviews, it is the author's responsibility... 1 credit [K2]

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lindsey at Dec 24, 2023, 04:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Whitley
1 months ago
Ah, the joys of code reviews. Where the author gets to play 'spot the difference' with the defect log. Fun times!
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
1 months ago
I've got a defect for ya - the person who wrote this question needs to review their own code review policies!
upvoted 0 times
Vallie
2 days ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 days ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
24 days ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walker
1 months ago
D) Correcting source documents with major defects? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. The author should be tackling the code itself, not the paperwork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
I disagree. I believe the author should only take action on improvement suggestions from the defect log to prioritize tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 months ago
I agree with Tawny. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
2 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
2 months ago
C) Addressing only improvement suggestions? That's a bit too lax, don't you think? As an author, I'd want to fix all the issues, not just the ones I feel like.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
12 days ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
14 days ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
16 days ago
B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
22 days ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
2 months ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
Beula
16 hours ago
D) to correct source documents that have major defects
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
9 days ago
C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
23 days ago
B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
29 days ago
A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
2 months ago
I believe the author should also take action on improvement suggestions to continuously improve the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
2 months ago
A) seems like the most comprehensive answer, addressing all defects regardless of their severity. That's what I would expect from a responsible author during code reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
2 months ago
I agree with Francene. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
2 months ago
I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel