I'm not totally confident, but I'm leaning towards B. The key is that 100% structural decision coverage means all the control flow branches were tested, not necessarily all possible data flows or execution paths.
Okay, I've got this. 100% structural decision coverage means that every possible branch or decision point in the code was executed at least once. So the answer is B.
Nah, 100% decision coverage doesn't guarantee that every path through the module was tested. That would require 100% path coverage, which is way more demanding. I'm going with B.
Hmm, I think the answer is B. If we achieved 100% structural decision coverage, that means every control flow branch was executed at least once. Seems straightforward enough.
Jonelle
2 months agoCeleste
2 months agoWilson
3 months agoRuthann
3 months agoRomana
3 months agoLisha
3 months agoAmber
4 months agoJacklyn
4 months agoRosio
4 months agoDarnell
4 months agoBen
4 months agoTwana
5 months agoDenae
5 months agoJunita
7 months agoDean
7 months agoCrista
7 months agoWeldon
6 months agoStarr
7 months agoJess
7 months agoLeeann
6 months agoKami
7 months agoGlen
7 months agoDeeanna
7 months agoLakeesha
7 months agoRusty
7 months agoLajuana
8 months agoValentine
7 months agoBuddy
7 months agoJesus
7 months agoLeonida
8 months ago