New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 5 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

You are starting to review some of the incident reports that have been submitted as a result of test execution.

Which THREE of the comments would be your main findings when you have reviewed the following incident report?

[K4] 3 credits, 2 out of 3 correct 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Micaela at Feb 06, 2023, 12:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosendo
4 months ago
Reproducibility is definitely a must-have in reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
4 months ago
Wait, how can the actual cause be missing? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
Ambiguous description is a big issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
4 months ago
Totally agree, one report isn't enough!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
4 months ago
Should have been two defect reports
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
5 months ago
I feel like we should definitely mention that the defect type is missing; it’s a common issue in incident reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where we talked about severity and priority not making sense, so that might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I’m not sure, but I feel like the actual cause might be missing too. That seems important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 months ago
I think one of the main findings could be the ambiguous description; it’s something we discussed in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
The retransmits and packet drops on the LIFs are a clear sign of a network problem. I'll start by verifying the NXOS firmware version to rule that out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Wouldn't the employee's manager be the one who would have the most information about their compensation? Or maybe the department head? I'm not entirely sure on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward date calculation question. I'll focus on using the correct date formats and functions to get the number of days between the two dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
9 months ago
Ah, the classic 'let's just slap a bandaid on it and hope it goes away' approach to incident reporting. I'm sure that'll work out just fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
9 months ago
Reproducibility not indicated? That's like trying to catch a unicorn without a net. Good luck with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
9 months ago
Hold up, the severity and priority don't make sense? That's like trying to drive a car with a broken steering wheel and flat tires. Not a good sign.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
8 months ago
We should make sure to address this issue in the incident report to avoid any further confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
8 months ago
Definitely, without clear severity and priority, it can lead to confusion and delays in fixing the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
8 months ago
I agree, it helps prioritize which issues need to be addressed first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
9 months ago
Yeah, that's a major red flag. It's important to have clear severity and priority levels in incident reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
10 months ago
Ugh, missing the actual cause? That's like trying to fix a problem without knowing what's broken. Definitely need to dig deeper on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
9 months ago
I agree, we definitely need more information to understand and fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
10 months ago
Yeah, missing the actual cause is a big issue. It's like shooting in the dark.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
10 months ago
I believe both severity and priority not making sense is also a major finding. It can impact the overall quality of the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
11 months ago
The ambiguous description is definitely a red flag. How are we supposed to reproduce and fix the issue with such vague details?
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
11 months ago
I agree with Shonda. Those are definitely key points to focus on when reviewing the incident report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
11 months ago
I think the main findings should be ambiguous description, actual cause missing, and reproducibility not indicated.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel