Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Analyzing the requirement, ''The system shall allow cash advances of at least 200 Euros for all supported credit cards. The correct list of credit cards is American Express, Diners, VISA, Mastercard and Eurocard.'' There are arguments to be made for several test design techniques.Which of the following test design techniques is LEAST likely to be used for identifying test cases for the requirement?[K4] 3 credits
A) Boundary value analysis
B) Equivalence Partitioning
C) Classification Tree Method
D) State Transition Testing

ISTQB ATA Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

Analyzing the requirement, ''The system shall allow cash advances of at least 200 Euros for all supported credit cards. The correct list of credit cards is American Express, Diners, VISA, Mastercard and Eurocard.'' There are arguments to be made for several test design techniques.

Which of the following test design techniques is LEAST likely to be used for identifying test cases for the requirement?

[K4] 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Latrice at Oct 25, 2022, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Oretha
8 months ago
All credit cards listed are valid for cash advances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
8 months ago
Not sure if State Transition Testing even applies.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
9 months ago
Wait, why would anyone choose A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
9 months ago
I think D is the least useful here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
9 months ago
B seems like the best fit for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
9 months ago
Equivalence Partitioning seems like it would apply here, but I feel like State Transition Testing doesn't really relate to cash advances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose the least relevant technique, and I think Classification Tree Method might not fit this requirement as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
9 months ago
I think Boundary Value Analysis would be relevant since we're dealing with a specific amount, but I'm not convinced about State Transition Testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
I remember studying the different test design techniques, but I'm not entirely sure which one is least applicable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
9 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about X.509 tokens in class. They're used to provide an X.509 digital certificate, so the correct answer must be a security token that supports that format. I'll select option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
9 months ago
I remember we discussed prescribing patterns as part of DUR, but it feels like that's more about actual usage rather than defining optimal use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
10 months ago
The match-val-type parameter is something I'll need to pay close attention to. Making sure it's written correctly could be the key to resolving this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
Wait, they're asking us to identify the *least* likely technique? I guess they want us to think outside the box... or maybe just outside the cash advance limit.
upvoted 0 times
Katheryn
1 year ago
D) State Transition Testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
1 year ago
C) Classification Tree Method
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
1 year ago
B) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 year ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
1 year ago
D) State Transition Testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
C) Classification Tree Method
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
1 year ago
B) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 year ago
Equivalence Partitioning sounds like the way to go. Just need to identify the different credit card types and test a representative sample.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
I believe Boundary value analysis is also not suitable for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 year ago
I'm going with Classification Tree Method. This requirement feels more like a simple input-output scenario, not something that would warrant a complex classification tree.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
1 year ago
I think State Transition Testing is the least likely to be used here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
1 year ago
I agree, Classification Tree Method seems like overkill for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
D) State Transition Testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 year ago
C) Classification Tree Method
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
1 year ago
B) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 year ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say State Transition Testing is the least likely. There doesn't seem to be any state changes involved in this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
1 year ago
I agree with Stephen. State Transition Testing doesn't seem relevant for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 year ago
I think Boundary Value Analysis is the least likely to be used here. The requirement doesn't really have any clear boundaries to test.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
1 year ago
Percy: Yeah, it seems like a better fit for identifying test cases for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Chan, Equivalence Partitioning makes more sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
1 year ago
User 2: I think Equivalence Partitioning would be more useful in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, Boundary Value Analysis doesn't seem relevant for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
1 year ago
I think the least likely test design technique is State Transition Testing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel