iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 3 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 48
Topic #: 3

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are working on a project to develop an authentication system for an e-commerce website. This system provides two features: Registration and authentication. Two different development teams develop these two features.

There is a high likelihood that the delivery of the authentication feature to the test team will be three weeks later. To complete the registration the user must provide the following registration inputs: Name, surname, birth date, fiscal code and he/she can select a username and a password. A registered user can be a special user or a normal user. To be identified as a special user, he/she must also provide, during the registration process, a voucher possibly received from the IT department.

Access is granted only if a user is registered and the password is correct: In all other cases access is denied. If the registered user is a special user and the password is wrong, a special warning is shown on the system console. You are currently performing a quality risk analysis using FMEA .

Based only on the given information, which of the following is NOT a product risk that could be identified during the quality risk analysis? K4 3 credits

AThe late delivery of the authentication feature to the test team causes delays in the start of test execution and this could result in a shorter test period

BThe authentication system denies access for a special user with a wrong password, but doesn't display a special warning on the system console

CThe authentication system grants access to a normal user with a wrong password

DThe authentication system grants access to a special user with a wrong password

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Heike at Nov 22, 2023, 07:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Albina

3 months ago

Access for a normal user with a wrong password? That's a huge security flaw!

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

3 months ago

I think the warning for special users is crucial, can't skip that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

3 months ago

Wait, how can a special user get access with a wrong password? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

4 months ago

Totally agree, the late delivery is a big risk for testing!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryann

4 months ago

The registration needs name, surname, birth date, fiscal code, and username/password.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards option A not being a product risk, but I’m not entirely confident since it could still affect the overall project timeline.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozelle

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where access issues were highlighted, so I feel like options C and D could both be serious risks if they happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

4 months ago

I think option B is definitely a product risk because not showing the warning could confuse users, but I’m a bit uncertain about the specifics of FMEA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loren

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how delays in feature delivery can impact testing timelines, but I'm not sure if that's considered a product risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marshall

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward risk analysis question. I'll go through the options carefully and eliminate the ones that are clearly mentioned as risks in the problem statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rusty

5 months ago

I'm not sure I fully understand the significance of the late delivery of the authentication feature. Does that introduce a specific risk, or is it just providing context?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is to identify the risks that are not explicitly stated, like issues with the registration process or the handling of invalid credentials.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a normal user and a special user. I'll need to carefully read through the details again to make sure I understand the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mike

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward. I'll focus on identifying the risks that are not mentioned in the problem statement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hollis

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is C. Pyramid schemes are all about recruiting new members rather than selling a real product, and that's exactly what this company seems to be doing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

5 months ago

I'm not sure about this one. A new DR site might be necessary if the current one is too far away, but that seems like overkill. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each option more carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I thought Spark was actually well-suited for iterative algorithms. Let me re-read the question carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deonna

10 months ago

Option B is the one that really catches my eye. Not displaying a proper warning for a special user is a missed opportunity to provide valuable feedback.

upvoted 0 times

Nan

9 months ago

Definitely, a missed warning could cause security concerns and user frustration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

9 months ago

Yes, providing clear feedback to users, especially special users, is crucial for a smooth user experience.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

9 months ago

It's important for the system to provide clear feedback to users, especially special users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

9 months ago

It's definitely a risk that should be addressed during the quality risk analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherrell

9 months ago

I agree, not showing a warning for a special user with a wrong password can lead to confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

10 months ago

I agree, not displaying a special warning for a special user with a wrong password could lead to confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

10 months ago

Ha! Imagine a special user getting a 'special warning' on the console for a wrong password. That's like having a fancy dinner bell to announce you've burned the roast.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elfriede

10 months ago

The late delivery of the authentication feature could definitely cause delays in testing, so option A is a valid concern. I hope the teams can work together to ensure a smooth rollout.

upvoted 0 times

Vinnie

9 months ago

C) The late delivery of the authentication feature could definitely cause delays in testing, so option A is a valid concern. I hope the teams can work together to ensure a smooth rollout.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherrie

9 months ago

B) The authentication system denies access for a special user with a wrong password, but doesn't display a special warning on the system console

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

9 months ago

A) The late delivery of the authentication feature to the test team causes delays in the start of test execution and this could result in a shorter test period

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlie

10 months ago

I'm surprised option C is even a possibility. Allowing normal users to access the system with the wrong password is a major oversight and a huge security vulnerability.

upvoted 0 times

Evangelina

9 months ago

User 2: I agree, it's important to ensure only authorized users have access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

9 months ago

User 1: Option C is definitely a big security risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

10 months ago

User 2: I agree, that's a major flaw in the authentication system. It should only grant access to registered users with the correct password.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlesetta

10 months ago

User 1: Option C is definitely a big security risk. Allowing normal users in with the wrong password is a no-go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

10 months ago

Hmm, option D seems like the obvious risk here. Granting access to a special user with a wrong password is a serious security flaw that needs to be addressed.

upvoted 0 times

...