Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You can count on well-written requirements, but you can't count on an adequate contribution of the stakeholders to the quality risk analysis. You have to mitigate the insufficient contribution of the stakeholders because the risk-based testing approach shall minimize the product risks. Your test team has one expert tester in security testing. Which of the following test activities would you expect to be the less important in this context? K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Brianne at Jan 14, 2025, 01:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Blondell
27 days ago
Option A? More like 'Extract from the dusty archives of the previous project's defects and pray they're still relevant.'
upvoted 0 times
Nida
8 days ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
16 days ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derrick
1 months ago
D is the way to go. Exploratory testing with security-focused charters is key when you can't rely on stakeholder input.
upvoted 0 times
Lawana
7 days ago
I think we should also consider automating all functional and non-functional system tests to ensure comprehensive coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
26 days ago
Agreed, exploratory testing with security-focused charters is crucial for thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
1 months ago
D is definitely important in this case. We need to cover all security aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernestine
1 months ago
Haha, option C is a joke, right? 'Systematic and exploratory' testing? That's like saying 'organized chaos'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
I'd have to go with B. Automating all functional and non-functional tests is the best way to ensure consistent, comprehensive testing coverage.
upvoted 0 times
Malissa
12 days ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
16 days ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vashti
2 months ago
But don't you think automating tests can help in ensuring security aspects are covered efficiently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most obvious choice here. Digging into past security defects is crucial to designing effective security tests for this project.
upvoted 0 times
Mignon
9 days ago
D) Perform exploratory testing sessions with adequate charters covering security aspects
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
18 days ago
C) Apply systematic and exploratory testing for integration and system test
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
23 days ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 months ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linette
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C) Apply systematic and exploratory testing for integration and system test would be less important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
I think option B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests would be the less important in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel