Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standardThese are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).The source code of the tool is available.Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard? and C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B? and F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
B) Does the tool have a good general usability?
D) Is the installation procedure of the tool easy?
E) Does the tool require a system with more than 4GB of RAM memory?

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are the Test Manager in charge of independent testing for avionics applications. You are in charge of testing for a project to implement three different CSCI (Computer Software Configuration Item):

- a BOOT-X CSCI that must be certified at level B of the DO-178B standard

- a DIAG-X CSCI that must be certified at level C of the DO-178B standard

- a DRIV-X CSCI that must be certified at level A of the DO-178B standard

These are three different software modules written in C language to run on a specific hardware platform.

You have been asked to select a single code coverage tool to perform the mandatory code coverage measurements, in order to meet the structural coverage criteria prescribed by the DO-178B standard. This tool must be qualified as a verification tool under DO-178B.

Since there are significant budget constraints to purchase this tool, you are evaluating an opensource tool that is able to provide different types of code coverage. This tool meets perfectly your technical needs in terms of the programming language and the specific hardware platform (it supports also the specific C-compiler).

The source code of the tool is available.

Your team could easily customize the tool to meet the project needs. This tool is not qualified as a verification tool under the DO-178B.

Which of the following are the three main concerns related to that open-source tool selection?

K4 3 credits (2 credits out of 3 credits correct, 1 credit point)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, F

by Micah at Aug 05, 2024, 04:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mabelle
9 months ago
Qualification costs might be a dealbreaker for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
9 months ago
Usability is important too, can't overlook that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
9 months ago
But can we really trust an open-source tool for avionics?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
10 months ago
Totally agree, certification is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
10 months ago
The tool needs to support all coverage types for levels A, B, C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
I wonder if the licensing scheme could be an issue. We need to make sure it aligns with our confidentiality requirements for avionics projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
10 months ago
I feel like we talked about the costs of qualifying the tool under DO-178B. That could be a significant factor given the budget constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the usability of the tool is also a concern. If it's too complicated, it might slow down our testing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of ensuring the tool supports all types of code coverage for different DO-178B levels, especially since we have level A, B, and C requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
11 months ago
The budget constraint is an important factor here. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of the open-source tool and consider the costs of qualifying it as a verification tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
11 months ago
This is a great opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of the DO-178B standard and the challenges of selecting the right tool for the job. I feel confident I can provide a solid response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
11 months ago
Okay, I see the main concerns are about the tool's capabilities, usability, and the costs to qualify it as a verification tool. I'll make sure to address those points in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think I can handle it. The key is to focus on the main concerns related to the open-source tool selection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different levels of DO-178B certification required for the three CSCIs. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
11 months ago
I think I know the functions of a SIP Proxy Server, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 years ago
Yes, cost is definitely a big factor. We need to ensure we can afford to qualify the tool properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
2 years ago
I believe another concern is the cost to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
2 years ago
Does the tool come with a 'DO-178B for Dummies' guide? Asking for a friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 years ago
The licensing better not be a headache, we don't want the avionics company's secrets leaking out.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
2 years ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
2 years ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
2 years ago
I hope the tool doesn't need a supercomputer to run! 4GB of RAM should be enough, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
2 years ago
E) Does the tool require a system with more than 4GB of RAM memory?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 years ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dell
2 years ago
I agree with Wade. It's crucial for the tool to cover all required levels of code coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
2 years ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
2 years ago
Another concern could be the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 years ago
I agree with Harris, that's crucial for meeting the structural coverage criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
2 years ago
Qualifying the tool as a verification tool under DO-178B is going to be a major challenge and cost, so that's definitely a top concern.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
2 years ago
F) Is the licensing scheme of the tool compatible with the confidentiality needs of the avionics company?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 years ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
2 years ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Harris
2 years ago
I think the main concern is if the tool supports all types of code coverage required by the DO-178B standard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 years ago
The open-source tool needs to support all the required coverage types across the three DO-178B levels, that's the most critical concern.
upvoted 0 times
Bettyann
2 years ago
C) What are the costs to qualify the tool as a verification tool under the DO-178B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
2 years ago
A) Does the tool support all the types of code coverage required from the three levels A, B, C of the DO-178B standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel