Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Which of the following factors could negatively influence a review?

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Peggie at Mar 09, 2024, 05:48 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Deonna
10 days ago
I bet option C is what the boss wants, but that's a recipe for disaster. Too many cooks in the kitchen, if you ask me. Where's the mute button on this exam?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
11 days ago
Option B all the way! You want those scrupulous, detail-oriented people who will leave no stone unturned. I'd hire a team of forensic accountants if I could!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
12 days ago
I'm torn between options A and B. You need both technical expertise and attention to detail to really uncover the issues. But I guess D covers that too...
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
27 days ago
I agree with option D. Objectivity and constructive discussion are key to a successful review. Anything less is just a waste of time.
upvoted 0 times
Edgar
4 days ago
I think option D is the most important factor for a successful review. It ensures that the feedback is valuable and constructive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
8 days ago
Definitely, having a clear and objective discussion is crucial for a productive review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
14 days ago
Yes, I agree. It's important to have people who can contribute meaningfully to the discussion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamela
1 months ago
Option C is a terrible idea! Including too many people will just lead to chaos and confusion. We need a focused, efficient review process, not a mob scene.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
8 days ago
D) Include people able to contribute to a clear, thoughtful, constructive and objective discussion
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
13 days ago
B) Include people who are detail-oriented and scrupulous at finding issues
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
29 days ago
A) Include people with the adequate level of knowledge, both technical and procedural
upvoted 0 times
...
...
In
2 months ago
I disagree. More people means more perspectives and potential issues can be identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
2 months ago
I agree with Blythe. Too many viewpoints might lead to confusion and inefficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
2 months ago
I think including too many people could negatively influence a review.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel