Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Assume you have some data related to confirmation testing during system testing of a past project.In that project 240 bug reports have been opened once, 80 were opened twice, 10 were opened three times and no bug reports have been opened more than three times.You estimate that a bug report, which has failed its confirmation test, costs, on average, 3 personhours.Which of the following statements correctly describe the value of these confirmatory testing activities based on cost of quality?K3 2 credits
C) 340 person-hours have been spent on the project during the system testing phase, because of the failed confirmation tests and this cost belongs to the costs of internal failure
A) 300 person-hours have been spent on the project during the system testing phase, because of the failed confirmation tests and this cost belongs to the costs of internal failure
B) 340 person-hours have been spent on the project during the system testing phase, because of the failed confirmation tests and this cost belongs to the costs of external failure
D) 300 person-hours have been spent on the project during the system testing phase, because of the failed confirmation tests and this cost belongs to the costs of detection

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you have some data related to confirmation testing during system testing of a past project.

In that project 240 bug reports have been opened once, 80 were opened twice, 10 were opened three times and no bug reports have been opened more than three times.

You estimate that a bug report, which has failed its confirmation test, costs, on average, 3 personhours.

Which of the following statements correctly describe the value of these confirmatory testing activities based on cost of quality?

K3 2 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

by Clay at Oct 07, 2023, 03:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Denae
9 months ago
D doesn’t fit, we’re not talking about detection costs here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
9 months ago
C sounds right, but I’m not sure about the internal failure part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
10 months ago
Wait, how does B add up to 340? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
I think A is correct, internal failure costs make sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
10 months ago
240 + 160 + 30 = 430 person-hours total.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
10 months ago
I feel like the total should be 340 person-hours since we have to account for all the failed tests, but I'm confused about whether that falls under internal or external failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to differentiate between internal and external failure costs, but I can't recall the exact definitions right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
11 months ago
I think the costs of internal failure are related to bugs found during testing, so maybe option A or C could be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how to calculate the total person-hours based on the number of bug reports, but I'm not sure if I got the math right for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
11 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I just need to do the math and then match the total cost to the correct category of cost of quality. I feel confident I can get this right if I work through it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is the cost of 3 person-hours per bug report the cost of the failed confirmation test, or the total cost of addressing the bug? I want to make sure I understand that before I choose an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to multiply the number of bug reports by the average cost per report to get the total cost. Then I'll need to decide if that cost belongs to internal failure, external failure, or detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully calculate the total person-hours spent on the failed confirmation tests to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
Alright, let me break this down. 240 bugs reported once, 80 reported twice, and 10 reported three times. That's a lot of data to crunch, but I think I can figure out the total person-hours and then determine which answer choice is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky question, but I think the key is to focus on how to best address the challenges NTO faced, like lack of agility and business value alignment. I'm leaning towards option B or C, as those seem to align with the Agile approach they found success with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
11 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the UiPath Robotic Enterprise Framework, so this question is a bit tricky for me. I'll have to guess and hope for the best. Maybe C? The Get Transaction Data state sounds like it could be the next step after Init.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the rule-based and simple workflows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I think it's definitely about how quickly data is generated, similar to questions we had on the quiz about the 3 Vs of Big Data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'll start by thinking about the default roles that would be assigned to the user setting up the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 year ago
I'd like to request a lifeline. Can I phone a friend who actually understands this 'cost of quality' stuff? No? Alright, I'll go with C then, even though it sounds like a random guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 year ago
Wait, are we supposed to be counting the number of bug reports or the total person-hours spent? This question is not very clear. I'll just guess C and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to think about it for a bit. But I'm leaning towards C, it just makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Francoise
1 year ago
Yeah, C seems to be the most fitting option considering the data given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 year ago
I agree, C does make sense based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. It seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leana
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think I'll go with option C just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 year ago
The answer is clearly C. The cost of 340 person-hours belongs to the costs of internal failure, as the bugs were discovered and fixed during the system testing phase.
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
1 year ago
I agree with you, C seems to be the correct answer. The cost of 340 person-hours belongs to the costs of internal failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
No, I believe the answer is C. The cost of 340 person-hours belongs to the costs of internal failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. The cost of 300 person-hours belongs to the costs of internal failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
1 year ago
But if we calculate the total person-hours spent, it matches with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel