Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Assume you are managing the system testing phase of a project.The system test execution period is scheduled to twenty weeks.All tests are manual tests. You are following a risk-driven test approach.During the last staff meeting the project manager tells you new deadlines that will not allow completion of all the system tests.Which of the following would you expect to be the best way to respond to this situation? K2 1 credit
C) Automate all remaining tests
A) Prioritize executing the tests for the highest product risks and track these risks
B) Remove testers from your test team, so that they can be assigned to other projects
D) No action is needed, test as much as possible in the remaining time period

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are managing the system testing phase of a project.

The system test execution period is scheduled to twenty weeks.

All tests are manual tests. You are following a risk-driven test approach.

During the last staff meeting the project manager tells you new deadlines that will not allow completion of all the system tests.

Which of the following would you expect to be the best way to respond to this situation? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Meaghan at Jul 28, 2023, 04:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Junita
9 months ago
Tracking risks is key, we can't test everything!
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
9 months ago
Surprised they think no action is needed, that's risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
10 months ago
Automating tests isn't feasible in such a short time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
10 months ago
I disagree, removing testers seems counterproductive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
10 months ago
Definitely prioritize the high-risk tests!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
10 months ago
I feel like just testing as much as possible without prioritization could lead to missing critical issues, so option D doesn't seem wise either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
10 months ago
Automating tests sounds appealing, but I recall that we can't just automate everything in a short time frame. So, option C might not be feasible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think removing testers could lead to more issues down the line. That doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
11 months ago
I remember we discussed prioritizing tests based on risk in our last study session, so option A seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
11 months ago
This one seems straightforward. Classification and regression are both examples of supervised learning, where the algorithm is trained on labeled data to make predictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I remember we discussed something about cameras used indoors with light coming through windows. Maybe that would be better suited for thermal?
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I know we need to use the relevant cross-entity BAdI to define the validations, but I'm not sure about the specific actions required. I'll review the options closely and try to eliminate the incorrect ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
1 year ago
I bet the project manager is just trying to see if we can pull off a magic trick and make all the tests disappear. Sorry, no rabbits in my hat, just a whole lot of risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 year ago
No action needed? Seriously? Did the project manager forget that we live in the real world, not some magical land where deadlines don't matter?
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
1 year ago
Automating all the remaining tests? Wow, that's ambitious. I wonder if the project manager would be okay with the development team taking a break to write all that code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
1 year ago
Removing testers? Really? That's like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Not a smart move at all.
upvoted 0 times
Eve
1 year ago
A) Prioritize executing the tests for the highest product risks and track these risks
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 year ago
Removing testers would only make things worse. We need to focus on the highest risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 year ago
B) Remove testers from your test team, so that they can be assigned to other projects
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 year ago
A) Prioritize executing the tests for the highest product risks and track these risks
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Judy
1 year ago
Automating all remaining tests could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
Prioritizing the highest-risk tests is definitely the way to go. Gotta focus on what matters most, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Brett
1 year ago
D) No action is needed, test as much as possible in the remaining time period
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 year ago
C) Automate all remaining tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
B) Remove testers from your test team, so that they can be assigned to other projects
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
1 year ago
A) Prioritize executing the tests for the highest product risks and track these risks
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laurel
1 year ago
I agree with Sueann. Tracking risks is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
1 year ago
I think we should prioritize executing tests for the highest product risks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel