iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 38
Topic #: 2

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are working on a CAS (Conditional Access System) for Pay-TV that allows the access, selection and transfer of services and media to authorized users. Authorized users can choose their services through different channels: Web Customer Portal, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), Call Centre and SMS. The system uses a Smart Card to receive and decrypt the broadcasted encrypted control words which allow decrypting pay-per-view TV. Every authorized user must have a Smart Card and a Set-Top Box to view the contents.

The following is an excerpt from the product risk analysis document:

Both likelihood and impact have been rated on the following scale: (1 -- Very low, 2 -- Low, 3 --Medium, 4 -- High, 5 -- Very High).

The required test environment and code have been delivered. All test cases for each identified product risk item have been written and are ready to be executed. The Database used to contain the Smart Cards is empty and so only new Smart Cards can be used during test execution.

A Smart Card can only be activated if it has been previously pre-activated. This means the postconditions for the execution of the test cases to test the pre-activation of the Smart Card are the pre-conditions for activation of the Smart Card.

Which of the following statements represents the most effective contribution of the stakeholders to the completion of the failure mode analysis table?

K4 3 credits

AThe aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.

BThe aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.

CThe system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.

DThe aircraft pilot is the only one qualified to contribute to assess the priority and thus should be assigned this task. The customer representative should contribute to assess the detection.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Stevie at Mar 25, 2023, 09:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Devon

7 months ago

The expert tester should definitely assess detection, no doubt!

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

7 months ago

Totally agree with option B! Prioritizing is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

7 months ago

Wait, why is the pilot involved in this? Seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannie

7 months ago

I think option A makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

7 months ago

A Smart Card needs pre-activation? Interesting!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elinore

8 months ago

I feel like the expert tester should have a role in assessing detection, but I’m not sure if the aircraft pilot should be the only one for priority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

8 months ago

From what I studied, it seems like the chief software engineer should be involved in assessing priority, but I'm not confident about the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

8 months ago

I think the aircraft pilot and customer representative should definitely be involved, but I can't recall if they assess priority or detection. It feels like a similar question we practiced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

8 months ago

I remember discussing the roles of stakeholders in our study group, but I'm not entirely sure who should assess priority versus detection in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Becky

8 months ago

I've seen this type of question before, and the key is to look for the variable that most closely matches the description in the question. I think B, ${CUENT.IPSRC}, is the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

8 months ago

I feel like we touched on how phones need to see multiple APs for roaming decisions, but I can't remember the exact number—was it four?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecily

8 months ago

Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to use the process of elimination here. I don't think A or D are correct, so I'm leaning towards B or C. Gotta make sure I don't overthink it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberto

1 year ago

Okay, let's focus here. The question is asking about the most effective contribution of stakeholders to the failure mode analysis. Based on the information provided, I think the system architect, chief software engineer, and expert tester would be the best ones to assess the priority, while the customer representative would be best suited to assess the detection.

upvoted 0 times

Kate

11 months ago

C) The system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

11 months ago

B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

11 months ago

A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

12 months ago

C) The system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

12 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Xochitl

1 year ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

1 year ago

Haha, the aircraft pilot must be moonlighting as a TV technician. I wonder if he also doubles as a plumber on the weekends.

upvoted 0 times

Yolande

12 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

12 months ago

Haha, the aircraft pilot must be moonlighting as a TV technician. I wonder if he also doubles as a plumber on the weekends.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

12 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Ula

1 year ago

I agree, the aircraft pilot is completely irrelevant here. This question is testing our understanding of stakeholder involvement in a failure mode analysis for a Pay-TV system. The key is to identify the appropriate stakeholders based on their expertise.

upvoted 0 times

Noble

1 year ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

1 year ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

1 year ago

The question is clearly focused on a Conditional Access System for Pay-TV, not an aircraft system. I'm not sure why the aircraft pilot is even mentioned. Seems like a random distractor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

1 year ago

I believe option A is the most effective, involving the aircraft pilot, customer representative, chief software engineer, system architect, and expert tester.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

1 year ago

I agree, having input from different roles will provide a more comprehensive analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

1 year ago

I think the stakeholders should work together to assess both detection and priority.

upvoted 0 times

...