New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 2 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Consider the following skills assessment spreadsheet for your test team (consisting of four team members):

This spreadsheet has three sections: technical expertise, testing skills and professionalism.

The skill levels for each skill area for both the ''technical expertise'' and ''testing skills'' sections have been rated on a four-point scale:

- E (Expert): indicates that a person has expert knowledge and experience in the skill area

- B (Beginner): indicates that a person has some knowledge and experience in the skill area but he/she is not autonomous

- W (Wants to learn): indicates that a person has no knowledge or experience in the skill area but he/she wants to learn that skill

- NI (Not Interested): indicates that a person has no knowledge or experience in the skill area and he/she is not interested to learn that skill

The skill levels for each skill area of the ''professionalism'' section have been rated on a three point scale (H=High, M=Medium, L=Low).

You are using this skills assessment spreadsheet in order to define a training development plan for your test team.

Your objective is to fill the skill gaps by having at least a team member rated as an expert for each skill identified for the ''technical expertise'' and ''testing skills'' sections, and with the ability to train the other team members.

Considering the budget constraints you can send only one person to a training course.

Based only on the given information, which of the following answers would you expect to be the best option to achieve your objective?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ozell
4 months ago
Alex has been wanting to learn more about performance testing, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure Robert is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
4 months ago
But what about Mark? His automation skills could really help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
Totally agree, sending Robert makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
4 months ago
Robert has the highest expertise in performance testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether sending Mark for automation would help with the performance testing gaps we have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
If I remember correctly, Robert had a higher rating in technical skills, so maybe he would be a good choice for performance testing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose the best candidate for training, but I can't recall the exact criteria we used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having at least one expert in each skill area, but I'm not sure who that would be based on the ratings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about using a roadmap for communications planning. I'll review the options carefully and choose the one that best describes the benefits of using a roadmap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I think it could be option B since it specifies an IP, but I'm not certain if the access-list needs to include both addresses in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. Option A seems like the simplest solution - just manage the business logic with a PCF control. That way, you can centralize the logic and make it easier to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel